This article was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2011. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Foster Natural Gas/Oil report is produced by Foster Associates, INC. It is a well respected company which delivers its report to a number of major players in the natural gas and oil industry, including congress. Please do not delete this page. Foster's competitor Platts has a page on wikipedia, and Foster should as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Katya Foster ( talk • contribs)
Please keep this article. The person who marked it for deletion clearly knows nothing about the natural gas/oil industry. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katya Foster ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok thank you so much for teaching me. i greatly appreciate all the help you have given me. -- Katya Foster ( talk) 19:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
The article was cleaned-up to remove promotional tone. However, this was reverted by the creator of this article. I believe that this was good faith edit by unexperienced editor. Therefore, I went through of cleaning this article and adding proper category one more time. However, I have a concern that this article may be created only for promotional purposes, which is supported by potential WP:COI and WP:OWNERSHIP issues. Beagel ( talk) 18:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved by Beyond My Ken ( talk · contribs). Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 00:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Foster Natural Gas/Oil Report → Foster Natural Gas Report – The creator of this article claims that since August 2011, the Foster Natural Gas Report was renamed to be Foster Natural Gas/Oil Report. However, there is no source using this name. Even the publisher's website uses the name Foster Natural Gas Report only.
The page was move to this title and moved back by another editor, so the move is controversial. It is also moved again by copy-paste method by third editor, so the article needs also history merge.
Discussion about this article title is also here. Beagel ( talk) 22:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
"Foster Associates report???? Where is citation for this? I dont see this information anywhere in the references. This needs to be referenced." This was not my question (see article history), but doesn't belong in the article, where I found it. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
What is the point of the see also section? Foster does not do business with these companies.-- Katya Foster ( talk) 20:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok but why are you only adding it to the Foster page. Why do the others not have a see also section? -- Katya Foster ( talk) 22:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok I understand that. But if this information is on the Foster page it should be on the other pages too. Otherwise, please let me remove it. Its only fair. -- Katya Foster ( talk) 22:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
SPA and CIO are welcome on talk pages. They often have insights and information into the subject that other editors do not have, and we should listen to them to see how we might improve the article. In the case of the "See also" section, Katya asked a valid question. Why are these links here and not on similar pages? It's more productive to answer this question than point a finger and say "SPA". Next: I see no evidence of a consensus. As Katya says, there are many reports, and I agree it's absurd to list only a few here. I'd support linking to an index of reports, however. Rklawton ( talk) 01:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
This is directed to Bwilkins: What are you talking about???? What consesus? And you say I am only editing the Foster article. I can edit as many or as few articles on wikipedia as I like. What does that have to do with anything? Now you are threatening to block me? For what? I would like you to please stop threatening me and to stop your rude and agressive behavior. It is unprofessional and childish.-- Katya Foster ( talk) 05:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
My edits are not one sided. I have knowledge about the Foster Report which I have tried to give to wikipedia. I am not editing articles about industries and companies that i have no knowledge in because that would be wrong. However, I am glad you are on the the topic of suspicious edits. Yours are suspicious. You undo everything I do. For instance, I once wrote something in a discussion forum, forgot to sign it, went back to sign it (the only change made) and you undid it. Why? What do you have against me that you must constantly undo everything I do even if I am within my rights and it makes sence what I am doing?-- Katya Foster ( talk) 06:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
That is not an explanation. You are taking things to an extreme. I did not change anything. I simply signed my edit. I did not add to it or delete it. And you know it!-- Katya Foster ( talk) 06:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up regarding the name change. Rklawton ( talk) 17:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2011. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Foster Natural Gas/Oil report is produced by Foster Associates, INC. It is a well respected company which delivers its report to a number of major players in the natural gas and oil industry, including congress. Please do not delete this page. Foster's competitor Platts has a page on wikipedia, and Foster should as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Katya Foster ( talk • contribs)
Please keep this article. The person who marked it for deletion clearly knows nothing about the natural gas/oil industry. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katya Foster ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok thank you so much for teaching me. i greatly appreciate all the help you have given me. -- Katya Foster ( talk) 19:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
The article was cleaned-up to remove promotional tone. However, this was reverted by the creator of this article. I believe that this was good faith edit by unexperienced editor. Therefore, I went through of cleaning this article and adding proper category one more time. However, I have a concern that this article may be created only for promotional purposes, which is supported by potential WP:COI and WP:OWNERSHIP issues. Beagel ( talk) 18:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved by Beyond My Ken ( talk · contribs). Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 00:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Foster Natural Gas/Oil Report → Foster Natural Gas Report – The creator of this article claims that since August 2011, the Foster Natural Gas Report was renamed to be Foster Natural Gas/Oil Report. However, there is no source using this name. Even the publisher's website uses the name Foster Natural Gas Report only.
The page was move to this title and moved back by another editor, so the move is controversial. It is also moved again by copy-paste method by third editor, so the article needs also history merge.
Discussion about this article title is also here. Beagel ( talk) 22:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
"Foster Associates report???? Where is citation for this? I dont see this information anywhere in the references. This needs to be referenced." This was not my question (see article history), but doesn't belong in the article, where I found it. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
What is the point of the see also section? Foster does not do business with these companies.-- Katya Foster ( talk) 20:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok but why are you only adding it to the Foster page. Why do the others not have a see also section? -- Katya Foster ( talk) 22:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok I understand that. But if this information is on the Foster page it should be on the other pages too. Otherwise, please let me remove it. Its only fair. -- Katya Foster ( talk) 22:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
SPA and CIO are welcome on talk pages. They often have insights and information into the subject that other editors do not have, and we should listen to them to see how we might improve the article. In the case of the "See also" section, Katya asked a valid question. Why are these links here and not on similar pages? It's more productive to answer this question than point a finger and say "SPA". Next: I see no evidence of a consensus. As Katya says, there are many reports, and I agree it's absurd to list only a few here. I'd support linking to an index of reports, however. Rklawton ( talk) 01:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
This is directed to Bwilkins: What are you talking about???? What consesus? And you say I am only editing the Foster article. I can edit as many or as few articles on wikipedia as I like. What does that have to do with anything? Now you are threatening to block me? For what? I would like you to please stop threatening me and to stop your rude and agressive behavior. It is unprofessional and childish.-- Katya Foster ( talk) 05:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
My edits are not one sided. I have knowledge about the Foster Report which I have tried to give to wikipedia. I am not editing articles about industries and companies that i have no knowledge in because that would be wrong. However, I am glad you are on the the topic of suspicious edits. Yours are suspicious. You undo everything I do. For instance, I once wrote something in a discussion forum, forgot to sign it, went back to sign it (the only change made) and you undid it. Why? What do you have against me that you must constantly undo everything I do even if I am within my rights and it makes sence what I am doing?-- Katya Foster ( talk) 06:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
That is not an explanation. You are taking things to an extreme. I did not change anything. I simply signed my edit. I did not add to it or delete it. And you know it!-- Katya Foster ( talk) 06:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up regarding the name change. Rklawton ( talk) 17:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)