Fossil Creek has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 June 2020 and 31 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Matthew Jez.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Would it be more correct to call the deposits tufa, or meteogene travertine? Based on the tufa and travertine pages, the material at Fossil Creek seems more likely to be tufa, because the water temperature is 72F. 159.87.11.241 ( talk) 23:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
etc. etc. -- and none for tufa. So we should go with the literature, I think. Best, Pete Tillman ( talk) 00:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
I am nominating this article for Good status on behalf of User:Finetooth, who did a fine expansion job. FT does not wish to guide the article through formal review processes. I had no part in conducting research for, or expanding, this article but I am happy to address concerns that may arise during the review process. Thanks. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gilderien ( talk · contribs) 20:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Images are good, no dead links, all citations seem sufficient. However:
Finetooth ( talk) 20:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 21:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 20:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
It was suggested in the NAU documentary "A River Reborn" that the dam(s) was the first dam to be removed not only in Arizona but the whole southwest. Is this a significant enough fact (if indeed it is a fact) to be added into the removal section of this article? A for a cited source, I am sorry i can not find the movie on line. However this is the movie i am referencing - http://perceval.bio.nau.edu/MPCER_OLD/riverreborn/description.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.19.30.148 ( talk) 06:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fossil Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Fossil Creek has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 June 2020 and 31 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Matthew Jez.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Would it be more correct to call the deposits tufa, or meteogene travertine? Based on the tufa and travertine pages, the material at Fossil Creek seems more likely to be tufa, because the water temperature is 72F. 159.87.11.241 ( talk) 23:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
etc. etc. -- and none for tufa. So we should go with the literature, I think. Best, Pete Tillman ( talk) 00:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
I am nominating this article for Good status on behalf of User:Finetooth, who did a fine expansion job. FT does not wish to guide the article through formal review processes. I had no part in conducting research for, or expanding, this article but I am happy to address concerns that may arise during the review process. Thanks. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gilderien ( talk · contribs) 20:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Images are good, no dead links, all citations seem sufficient. However:
Finetooth ( talk) 20:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 21:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 20:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
It was suggested in the NAU documentary "A River Reborn" that the dam(s) was the first dam to be removed not only in Arizona but the whole southwest. Is this a significant enough fact (if indeed it is a fact) to be added into the removal section of this article? A for a cited source, I am sorry i can not find the movie on line. However this is the movie i am referencing - http://perceval.bio.nau.edu/MPCER_OLD/riverreborn/description.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.19.30.148 ( talk) 06:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fossil Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)