This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Alberta / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta. This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada. Politics: Political parties Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

..., grass routes accountability, ...
I suspected the author wanted to use the term grass roots, depicting a thorough approach of action at the basis, instead of grass routes, which I have never heard, but which sounds to me like a cross-country-hike. I changed the phrase accordingly, but I'm not a native speaker, so please let me know if I'm wrong here.
-- BjKa 10:08, 8 September 2005 (UTC) reply

• No, you're quite right. Thanks for catching this mistake. Ground Zero | t 13:44, 8 September 2005 (UTC) reply