This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
All - I'd like to significantly expand the historical information on the fort and grounds, based primarily upon the considerable information available from National Park Service sites and sources, as well as adding a few more historical photos and artwork. Looking through the history, it seems like the page has remained relatively consistent for a while now, so don't want to offend anyone by making changes/expansions.
Any objections? -- Craigbucher ( talk) 05:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
All - I've completed updates to the historical sections. If you have anything else you'd like me to add or address, or take exception to how I've incorporated the previously-existing info, please let me know. Thanks! Craigbucher ( talk) 01:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Also, do you think there's any benefit to splitting off the "fort" ( the historical fortifications and military facilities) from the present-day national park and its facilities/attractions?
All - I'd like to remove the following photos, previously in the body of the article, now in the gallery:
- The photo of the main gate: it's almost completely in shadow, and is also represented in the main photo in the infobox - Re-enactors: they're basically all lounging around - I'd like to replace them with photos of re-enactors in action (firing a cannon, etc.)
Please let me know what you think. Thanks! Craigbucher ( talk) 01:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
All - I'd like to significantly expand the historical information on the fort and grounds, based primarily upon the considerable information available from National Park Service sites and sources, as well as adding a few more historical photos and artwork. Looking through the history, it seems like the page has remained relatively consistent for a while now, so don't want to offend anyone by making changes/expansions.
Any objections? -- Craigbucher ( talk) 05:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
All - I've completed updates to the historical sections. If you have anything else you'd like me to add or address, or take exception to how I've incorporated the previously-existing info, please let me know. Thanks! Craigbucher ( talk) 01:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Also, do you think there's any benefit to splitting off the "fort" ( the historical fortifications and military facilities) from the present-day national park and its facilities/attractions?
All - I'd like to remove the following photos, previously in the body of the article, now in the gallery:
- The photo of the main gate: it's almost completely in shadow, and is also represented in the main photo in the infobox - Re-enactors: they're basically all lounging around - I'd like to replace them with photos of re-enactors in action (firing a cannon, etc.)
Please let me know what you think. Thanks! Craigbucher ( talk) 01:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)