This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to attempt to add an infobox to this article. Derek Balsam (talk) 01:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure if this is were I would say this, but I feel if the page should have the current command for Fort Wainwright. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeclark7183 ( talk • contribs) 04:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Copying my rationale from Talk:Ladd Army Airfield:
Therefore I believe this qualifies for merger under WP:MM#Overlap, WP:MM#Text, and WP:MM#Context. Derek Balsam (talk) 02:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Taking a look at this years later: Ladd's article is far better fleshed out, in spite of its comparatively limited history, due mostly to pillaging the same tired old PD sources found in countless other articles. The lack of willingness to pursue more organic sourcing has left this article wide open to Superfund enthusiasts, who I suppose figure that they have free reign to dump their POV and that eventually some other interest group will come along to dump their POV and that somehow "everything will balance out". "The original merge tag was placed on the article on 7 November 2006, and no further action or discussion was ever initiated". In other words, if someone else doesn't go to all the trouble right off the bat, no one else should be bothered (better known as The Story of Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody). It's a common time-wasting gambit, which simply enables/justifies rampant content forking instead of curtailing it. WP Aviation and WP MilHist have long been busy building islands instead of bridges between the two topic areas, even when they're closely related. Throw in the excess of Superfund POV, and there shouldn't be any question why I've tagged this article as having problems. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to attempt to add an infobox to this article. Derek Balsam (talk) 01:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure if this is were I would say this, but I feel if the page should have the current command for Fort Wainwright. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeclark7183 ( talk • contribs) 04:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Copying my rationale from Talk:Ladd Army Airfield:
Therefore I believe this qualifies for merger under WP:MM#Overlap, WP:MM#Text, and WP:MM#Context. Derek Balsam (talk) 02:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Taking a look at this years later: Ladd's article is far better fleshed out, in spite of its comparatively limited history, due mostly to pillaging the same tired old PD sources found in countless other articles. The lack of willingness to pursue more organic sourcing has left this article wide open to Superfund enthusiasts, who I suppose figure that they have free reign to dump their POV and that eventually some other interest group will come along to dump their POV and that somehow "everything will balance out". "The original merge tag was placed on the article on 7 November 2006, and no further action or discussion was ever initiated". In other words, if someone else doesn't go to all the trouble right off the bat, no one else should be bothered (better known as The Story of Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody). It's a common time-wasting gambit, which simply enables/justifies rampant content forking instead of curtailing it. WP Aviation and WP MilHist have long been busy building islands instead of bridges between the two topic areas, even when they're closely related. Throw in the excess of Superfund POV, and there shouldn't be any question why I've tagged this article as having problems. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)