This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 19:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
See article published by the N Y Times, November 26, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/opinion/26davis.html?th&emc=th -- Wkboonec ( talk) 11:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes, a a very important part of American history conveniently neglected to be mentioned. Is Wikipedia trying to suppress something? This is probably what the Fort is known for more so than what is listed in this article. BenW ( talk) 01:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
In some edit summaries or comments elsewhere, I saw some suggestion that recently created Fort Matanzas National Monument Headquarters and Visitor Center should not be a separate article, could be covered within this National Monument article. I think it should be separate. The current coverage in this article is just right: a bare mention in one sentence plus a See Also link. It would be confusing to readers to give more, about the National Park Service rustic architecture etc., which is hugely secondary to the real history of the place. Happy to discuss as always, am suggesting here is the place to discuss if anyone is interested. -- do ncr am 13:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 19:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
See article published by the N Y Times, November 26, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/opinion/26davis.html?th&emc=th -- Wkboonec ( talk) 11:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes, a a very important part of American history conveniently neglected to be mentioned. Is Wikipedia trying to suppress something? This is probably what the Fort is known for more so than what is listed in this article. BenW ( talk) 01:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
In some edit summaries or comments elsewhere, I saw some suggestion that recently created Fort Matanzas National Monument Headquarters and Visitor Center should not be a separate article, could be covered within this National Monument article. I think it should be separate. The current coverage in this article is just right: a bare mention in one sentence plus a See Also link. It would be confusing to readers to give more, about the National Park Service rustic architecture etc., which is hugely secondary to the real history of the place. Happy to discuss as always, am suggesting here is the place to discuss if anyone is interested. -- do ncr am 13:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)