This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fort Bridgewoods article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of
Kent in
South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
Should this article be "Bridgewood" or "Bridgewoods" ? I ask because both forms of spelling are used in the article. Consistent it is not.
RASAM (
talk)
16:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Bridgewoods. The external link pdf calls it that, and has a photo with that name. Local history booklets and Saunders Fortress Britain use the plural
Vicarage (
talk)
22:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Then it might be a good idea to move this article to
Fort Bridgewoods, and for consistency, edit the text accordingly. At the moment it is a rather pointless redirect. What do you think
Vicarage ? (By the way, I'll do the text, if you do the moving; or tell me how to do it).
RASAM (
talk)
20:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Good idea, but I fear moving the article would upset the wikipedian gods, as I don't know the protocol. Can I leave the whole thing to you.
Vicarage (
talk)
05:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)reply
As I said above, I'll do the text, but I don't know how to move the page; if you are in the same boat, we're both snookered and that's a shame.
RASAM (
talk)
23:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)reply
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fort Bridgewoods article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of
Kent in
South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
Should this article be "Bridgewood" or "Bridgewoods" ? I ask because both forms of spelling are used in the article. Consistent it is not.
RASAM (
talk)
16:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Bridgewoods. The external link pdf calls it that, and has a photo with that name. Local history booklets and Saunders Fortress Britain use the plural
Vicarage (
talk)
22:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Then it might be a good idea to move this article to
Fort Bridgewoods, and for consistency, edit the text accordingly. At the moment it is a rather pointless redirect. What do you think
Vicarage ? (By the way, I'll do the text, if you do the moving; or tell me how to do it).
RASAM (
talk)
20:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Good idea, but I fear moving the article would upset the wikipedian gods, as I don't know the protocol. Can I leave the whole thing to you.
Vicarage (
talk)
05:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)reply
As I said above, I'll do the text, but I don't know how to move the page; if you are in the same boat, we're both snookered and that's a shame.
RASAM (
talk)
23:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)reply