![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
A {{ Citation needed}} tag was added on the statement:
This statement comes directly from the source already cited at the end of the paragraph. For clarity I repeated the citation in the middle of the paragraph too. If you look at page 254:
What the authors wrote there is verified by the draft version of the treaty itself. When the executive branch sent that over to Congress for approval, they included the following note [1] (page 4):
The actual Article 9, Paragraph 4 (page 15 of that document):
And later the document confirms that the Senate rejected that part in ratifying the treaty:
The above material is probably too long for the actual article itself (which is supposed to be about formulary apportionment worldwide, not just in California), so I'll just leave it here on the talk page. Thanks, Eric Baer ( talk) 11:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Formulary apportionment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
These categories make the article US centric. US (=domestic??) and the rest of the world is ‘international’?? What about ‘in Ireland taxation’??
This is a global issue. Article restructuring required Riskit 4 a biskit ( talk) 02:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
A {{ Citation needed}} tag was added on the statement:
This statement comes directly from the source already cited at the end of the paragraph. For clarity I repeated the citation in the middle of the paragraph too. If you look at page 254:
What the authors wrote there is verified by the draft version of the treaty itself. When the executive branch sent that over to Congress for approval, they included the following note [1] (page 4):
The actual Article 9, Paragraph 4 (page 15 of that document):
And later the document confirms that the Senate rejected that part in ratifying the treaty:
The above material is probably too long for the actual article itself (which is supposed to be about formulary apportionment worldwide, not just in California), so I'll just leave it here on the talk page. Thanks, Eric Baer ( talk) 11:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Formulary apportionment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
These categories make the article US centric. US (=domestic??) and the rest of the world is ‘international’?? What about ‘in Ireland taxation’??
This is a global issue. Article restructuring required Riskit 4 a biskit ( talk) 02:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)