This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Singapore High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sources belong here, not in external links or references, unless they are used as inline references It's true! So many well-intended sources appear to be dumped in the External links sections as if it's a parking lot for them. Perhaps some editors are unfamiliar with the process; please leave me a note on my talk page and I'll be glad to discuss it. In addition, the use of galleries in articles are generally frowned upon. Images are meant to reflect and enhance the information in the text, so I have removed the galleries per WP:IG. Please do not take this personally. Let us work to expand the text and reference it! -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 21:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC) These sources do not belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them over, so be careful in choosing any references here. Thank you! reply

• National Heritage Board (2002), Singapore's 100 Historic Places, Archipelago Press, ISBN  981-4068-23-3
• Norman Edwards, Peter Keys (1996), Singapore — A Guide to Buildings, Streets, Places, Times Books International, ISBN  981-204-781-6
• Ho, Weng Hin (2008), The Former Supreme Court of Singapore & its Artificial Stone: Documentation, Analysis & Conservation Guidelines for a National Monument, Genoa: unpublished thesis, School of Specialization in Restoration of Monuments, University of Genoa, OCLC  233929838.
• History of Supreme Court