![]() | Forglen House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 26, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Forglen House (pictured) has "all the romantic aspirations of the early 19th century poured into it"? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld ( talk · contribs) 20:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Will review within next three days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Looks in really good shape, I await your response @ Sagaciousphil:♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Looks good for GA!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Forglen House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 26, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Forglen House (pictured) has "all the romantic aspirations of the early 19th century poured into it"? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld ( talk · contribs) 20:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Will review within next three days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Looks in really good shape, I await your response @ Sagaciousphil:♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Looks good for GA!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)