![]() | A news item involving Forex scandal was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 May 2015. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is OUT-OF-DATE:
Etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB91:1C75:1AFF:2438:3DDE:F620:841 ( talk) 23:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
I am unsure whether this quote is genuine, or genuine but misplaced, or a hoax or vandalism.
Dont want other numpty's in mkt to know [about information exchanged within the group], but not only that is he gonna protect us like we protect each other…
Citibank trader — on prospective new member to the cartel chatroom [1] [2]
References
I see the Forex scandal is at least a decade long manipulation of $5.3 trillion-a-day foreign exchange market, and lead to $5.7billion fine. Ok. But what is the overall estimated cost of the fraud ? Yug (talk) 09:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Forex scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | A news item involving Forex scandal was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 May 2015. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is OUT-OF-DATE:
Etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB91:1C75:1AFF:2438:3DDE:F620:841 ( talk) 23:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
I am unsure whether this quote is genuine, or genuine but misplaced, or a hoax or vandalism.
Dont want other numpty's in mkt to know [about information exchanged within the group], but not only that is he gonna protect us like we protect each other…
Citibank trader — on prospective new member to the cartel chatroom [1] [2]
References
I see the Forex scandal is at least a decade long manipulation of $5.3 trillion-a-day foreign exchange market, and lead to $5.7billion fine. Ok. But what is the overall estimated cost of the fraud ? Yug (talk) 09:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Forex scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)