![]() | Forever & Always has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 00:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Forever & Always → Forever and Always (Taylor Swift song) – This album track is up for AFD, but with or without, it is not the only subject, nor more notable than all other Forever and Always topics combined. The "&" doesn't predominate in Google Books, most Taylor Swift bios use "and". Forever and Always (Lefty Frizzell song) 1952 is currently a redirect, but clearly the most notable long term (song) topic. In ictu oculi ( talk) 21:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move to Forever & Always (Taylor Swift song). ( non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Forever and Always (Taylor Swift song) → Forever & Always (Taylor Swift song) – The consensus in the 2014 discussion was that the ampersand was not sufficient disambiguation for the article to simply be titled Forever & Always. That does not indicate consensus for Wikipedia to change the name of the song as it appears on Swift's album, or as it is reported in reliable sources. Chase ( talk | contributions) 03:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
User:HĐ The first half of the paragraph you wrote into Composition and Reception..{ In "Forever & Always", Swift sings about her relationship with a boyfriend, who still "hasn't called" despite the fact that at an earlier point in their relationship, he had declared that they would be together "forever and always". } seems to deem better fit in the ‘Background & recording’ section of the article to me. Let me know your thoughts! Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 01:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
User:HĐ
Self-trout My apologies for bothering you, I thought that was the best way to go about revising an edit from a Veteran such as yourself! Take care!
Elvisisalive95 (
talk)
02:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Doomsdayer520: I realise that you were only doing a TR, and that Tree Critter shouldn't have made a TR counter a historical RM result above, but were there any other factors in implementing the TR which mean the above RM result no longer stands? Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 22:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Forever & Always has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 00:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Forever & Always → Forever and Always (Taylor Swift song) – This album track is up for AFD, but with or without, it is not the only subject, nor more notable than all other Forever and Always topics combined. The "&" doesn't predominate in Google Books, most Taylor Swift bios use "and". Forever and Always (Lefty Frizzell song) 1952 is currently a redirect, but clearly the most notable long term (song) topic. In ictu oculi ( talk) 21:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move to Forever & Always (Taylor Swift song). ( non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Forever and Always (Taylor Swift song) → Forever & Always (Taylor Swift song) – The consensus in the 2014 discussion was that the ampersand was not sufficient disambiguation for the article to simply be titled Forever & Always. That does not indicate consensus for Wikipedia to change the name of the song as it appears on Swift's album, or as it is reported in reliable sources. Chase ( talk | contributions) 03:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
User:HĐ The first half of the paragraph you wrote into Composition and Reception..{ In "Forever & Always", Swift sings about her relationship with a boyfriend, who still "hasn't called" despite the fact that at an earlier point in their relationship, he had declared that they would be together "forever and always". } seems to deem better fit in the ‘Background & recording’ section of the article to me. Let me know your thoughts! Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 01:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
User:HĐ
Self-trout My apologies for bothering you, I thought that was the best way to go about revising an edit from a Veteran such as yourself! Take care!
Elvisisalive95 (
talk)
02:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Doomsdayer520: I realise that you were only doing a TR, and that Tree Critter shouldn't have made a TR counter a historical RM result above, but were there any other factors in implementing the TR which mean the above RM result no longer stands? Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 22:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)