This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Forestry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

@ Fredlyfish4:, should the protected-area category be removed from the article space? Seasider53 ( talk) 19:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The categories as they are now are ok. It's just in WP PAs we don't cover every article related to protected areas or the features within them. Typically we see articles such as those about mountains or lakes within PAs, but those are more appropriately covered by WP Mountains and WP Lakes, respectively. Since this is part of a national park with it's own article it's covered there. The protected areas categories are ok since they help keep together related articles. Fredlyfish4 ( talk) 20:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply