![]() | Forced abortion of Feng Jianmei was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 1, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that more than one million comments about
Feng Jianmei's forced abortion had been registered within four days of family members uploading a picture of her dead child to
Sina Weibo? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Bstephens393 ( talk · contribs) 15:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
I intend to review this article, but it may take about a week or so to carefully scrutinize it. Bstephens393 ( talk) 15:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Overall the article is very thorough, well written and informative. As far as I can tell, it is factually accurate, uses plenty of good sources (though I noticed that the one most commonly cited is the state-owned Global Times—kind of interesting), and it seems neutral, complete, and stable. I do have some comments though, and I think once these are addressed it will be all set. Since this is my first GA review, I would also welcome second opinions.
Let me know when you think you'll be able to address these concerns, and I look forward to passing the article! Bstephens393 ( talk) 19:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
I will be making some edits to reduce redundancy and overall length in the coming days. I will focus entirely on tightening it up rather than editing for content. I do not intend to make any changes to the information presented in this first effort. Just giving a heads up to anyone watching the article. —Zujine| talk 05:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I feel like the title is off, a title like Forced abortion of Feng Jianmei makes it seem like "Feng Jianmei" was aborted instead of the abortion being performed on her. In general titles like Death of X, Suicide of X, Murder of X or Killing of X mean that X was the subject which was "removed" (for a lack of a better word). I feel like it should be moved to somehting like Forced abortion performed on Feng Jianmei instead. ★Trekker ( talk) 17:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Forced abortion of Feng Jianmei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Large amounts of uncited text, including for quotes and statistics, thus failing GA criterion 2. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 11:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Forced abortion of Feng Jianmei was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 1, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that more than one million comments about
Feng Jianmei's forced abortion had been registered within four days of family members uploading a picture of her dead child to
Sina Weibo? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Bstephens393 ( talk · contribs) 15:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
I intend to review this article, but it may take about a week or so to carefully scrutinize it. Bstephens393 ( talk) 15:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Overall the article is very thorough, well written and informative. As far as I can tell, it is factually accurate, uses plenty of good sources (though I noticed that the one most commonly cited is the state-owned Global Times—kind of interesting), and it seems neutral, complete, and stable. I do have some comments though, and I think once these are addressed it will be all set. Since this is my first GA review, I would also welcome second opinions.
Let me know when you think you'll be able to address these concerns, and I look forward to passing the article! Bstephens393 ( talk) 19:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
I will be making some edits to reduce redundancy and overall length in the coming days. I will focus entirely on tightening it up rather than editing for content. I do not intend to make any changes to the information presented in this first effort. Just giving a heads up to anyone watching the article. —Zujine| talk 05:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I feel like the title is off, a title like Forced abortion of Feng Jianmei makes it seem like "Feng Jianmei" was aborted instead of the abortion being performed on her. In general titles like Death of X, Suicide of X, Murder of X or Killing of X mean that X was the subject which was "removed" (for a lack of a better word). I feel like it should be moved to somehting like Forced abortion performed on Feng Jianmei instead. ★Trekker ( talk) 17:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Forced abortion of Feng Jianmei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Large amounts of uncited text, including for quotes and statistics, thus failing GA criterion 2. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 11:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)