This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
This article has been classified as relating to
gross anatomy.
Cecum or Cæcum?
Gray's lists it as Foramen cæcum, but several sites and articles refer to it as Foramen cecum. We'll need to agree on a general spelling... --
Marcus09:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Also, there are various types of foramina cæcum (e.g. f. caecum medullae oblongatae/linguae), would it be a good idea to incorporate all of them or just f. caecum ossis frontalis? (see infobox) --
Marcus19:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't have an opinion on the first point, but for the second one, I think it would be better for them to be on separate pages, moved
Foramen cecum to
Foramen cecum (frontal bone), and set up a new page at
Foramen cecum to serve as disambiguation. (I'm curious, though, why these structures all have the same name. It appears that "cecum" comes from the Latin "caecus" for blind, so perhaps these were all "blind holes", that early anatomists couldn't clearly define.) --
Arcadian20:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
This article has been classified as relating to
gross anatomy.
Cecum or Cæcum?
Gray's lists it as Foramen cæcum, but several sites and articles refer to it as Foramen cecum. We'll need to agree on a general spelling... --
Marcus09:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Also, there are various types of foramina cæcum (e.g. f. caecum medullae oblongatae/linguae), would it be a good idea to incorporate all of them or just f. caecum ossis frontalis? (see infobox) --
Marcus19:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't have an opinion on the first point, but for the second one, I think it would be better for them to be on separate pages, moved
Foramen cecum to
Foramen cecum (frontal bone), and set up a new page at
Foramen cecum to serve as disambiguation. (I'm curious, though, why these structures all have the same name. It appears that "cecum" comes from the Latin "caecus" for blind, so perhaps these were all "blind holes", that early anatomists couldn't clearly define.) --
Arcadian20:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)reply