This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

American football This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. National Football League Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've rewritten and hopefully cleaned up virtually the whole article. I've removed the sections on the message board curse and ROBO-PUNTER because, to be honest, I think they're pretty much non-notable and only of interest to people who frequent the site's message boards. Barnas 20:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply

ROBO-PUNTER almost certainly belongs. The idea of fairly assessing value, including theoretical maximum value for a given position, is entirely in line with Football Outsiders' "SABRmetric" approach to analysis. 12.159.137.232 ( talk) 15:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC) reply

I've never edited or contributed on Wikipedia before, so forgive me if this isn't formatted right. There is a sentence that reads "Over the course of time, the site added more writers, and hosed Gregg Easterbrook for part of 2003." Is that a typo? Did they host him, or hose him? 99.22.111.42 ( talk) 03:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)skrame reply

You doubt the relevance of Robo-Punter?

I have seen the robopunter thread, and it does not deserve a separate article here. I've added a merge template so we do not have a separate article for that. DandyDan2007 ( talk) 11:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC) reply

I merged it with this article. Enigma ^message 18:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC) reply