![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I believe as there are many features and extra informatin about Football Manager Handheld series it should have its own article, like the individual PC games, it could have information on each of the individual FMH games, perhaps it could be called "Football Manager Handheld" article and have extra information, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 07ed01 ( talk • contribs) 08:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Think this section should stay. If you know the game you will agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.168.109 ( talk) 01:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Just updating information regarding the games relationship to BGS' Championship Manager 5. The old page said that FM will compete with CM5, wheras they already do. I don't feel that it's appropriate, however, to point out CM5's many flaws in this page, instead I have merely said that it was severely delayed (the truth).-- Dan 11:20, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
I think this article needs to be split into sections, one for each version of the game, like in the article about Championship Manager. Or maybe have one page called Football Manager series linking to a seperate article for each version of the game (e.g. the Star Fox series page). Anyone with me?
Removal of linkage to external sites which are basically blogs which are not related to the game, save for an ocassional mention:
For a start, saying a site is 'new' is just bad practice. What if someone comes along in a year and reads this. Is it 'new' then as well? Is it buggery.
Here's a copy of my talk page: Regarding your edits the the Football Manager article. It seems that you added a community resource section to it when there was already one at the bottom. Not only that but it was placed in a seemingly random place when external resources are usually placed at the bottom. These have now been removed and the logo resource has been placed at the bottom of the external links section as SortItOutSI already had a link. And finally, where did you get your 'millions of files' from? If you refer to the title of Susie, then that means the number of times files have been downloaded; not the number of files available.
Reply: I am perfectly aware of the bottom section. Yet I think the patching thing should be pointed out separately. Merely giving some link doesn't give a reader full info that FM can be patched etc. I am sorry for maybe not doing it properly but I still think a separate Patching section should be added.
Please discuss.
Ok, solved.
FYI: I have sent an email to Kevin Toms asking if we can use the pictures of the Football Manager screenshots on his website.
I think it'd be great if we can add some more history to the game instead of a brief paragraph. I think that the game that started it all deserves much more than that!
I've also sent an email to Marc Duffy at SI asking for permission to use the FM 2006 boxart as the picture for the infobox, as most detailed articles on videogames have this instead of a screenie.
Until I get approval, the image lies here waiting to be used. The licencing may need altering as it's set as DVD cover art (there wasn't anything for videogames (except screenshots)).-- Dan (Talk) 10:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I have received an email confirming that he has no problems with the use of Football Manager screenshots on the site. He is, however, unsure of the copyright situation:
Sure, Dan, I have no problems with you using pictures. Not sure what the copyright situation is, if that is what you are asking. If you have questions, or things you want to find out from me for your article, please ask. Kind regards, Kevin
-- Dan (Talk)| @ 17:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
What exactly is allowed in here? If we were to include all links to every single FM site it would not exactly make the article look nice, nor help with its encyclopedic content, and I think it should be limited to the more "well-known" ones (MC and perhaps Susie)? NSL E ( T+ C) 00:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
I think the links to fan sites are useful, because SI official site is quite crappy. So, I'm for option 2, even though I have no idea what an "affiliate" site is. Grue 09:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Looks like the vote's over then - unless there's a last minute rush of votes for option one. Ukdan999 19:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
P.S. I stand by what I say about some sites looking like nothing more than glorified blogs.-- Dan (Talk)| @ 22:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Also worth a try is [www.footyman.com]. It is extremely popular and well run. The site contains infromation on the beloved game with players, staff and hints to give you a head start in Football Manager. Try it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.107.68 ( talk) 17:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone have a definite linkable source to 'prove' that the German, Dutch and Japanese teams don't pick real players?
I'm asking this because about 10% of all edits (and nearly 100% or all reverts) relate to people adding and/or removing countries that pick actual players.
It's getting tedious to see them pop up along with relatively fast reverts (generally done by NSLE
) and a source would put these revert problems to rest for good (or until the next version of FM is released!
).
Cheers -- Dan (Talk)| @ 00:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
In my version I have all of them enabled with some lnc hacking, but I was sure that Dutch team is disabled by default. Grue 07:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
The Dutch team do pick the real players. They are a licensed side on the game, and are the only national team to have their kits and logo on the game. Adam_Scott_89
Hey all!
After Sports Interactive's recent announcement regarding Football Manager 2007, I felt that enough information was available to start an article which could, at least, outline the announcement of the game details with quotes.-- Dan (Talk)| @ 13:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Where on earth did you get the release date of October 20? Isn't the official release set on Christmas 2006? You better verify this allegation. -- 213.250.12.139 12:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Fm08boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 13:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Football Manager ad.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
The information in the article is incorrect. The Brazilian national leagues available in Football Manager Handheld are the Série A and the Série B. -- Carioca ( talk) 20:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Football Manager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sigames.com/content/football-manager-onlineWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I believe as there are many features and extra informatin about Football Manager Handheld series it should have its own article, like the individual PC games, it could have information on each of the individual FMH games, perhaps it could be called "Football Manager Handheld" article and have extra information, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 07ed01 ( talk • contribs) 08:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Think this section should stay. If you know the game you will agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.168.109 ( talk) 01:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Just updating information regarding the games relationship to BGS' Championship Manager 5. The old page said that FM will compete with CM5, wheras they already do. I don't feel that it's appropriate, however, to point out CM5's many flaws in this page, instead I have merely said that it was severely delayed (the truth).-- Dan 11:20, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
I think this article needs to be split into sections, one for each version of the game, like in the article about Championship Manager. Or maybe have one page called Football Manager series linking to a seperate article for each version of the game (e.g. the Star Fox series page). Anyone with me?
Removal of linkage to external sites which are basically blogs which are not related to the game, save for an ocassional mention:
For a start, saying a site is 'new' is just bad practice. What if someone comes along in a year and reads this. Is it 'new' then as well? Is it buggery.
Here's a copy of my talk page: Regarding your edits the the Football Manager article. It seems that you added a community resource section to it when there was already one at the bottom. Not only that but it was placed in a seemingly random place when external resources are usually placed at the bottom. These have now been removed and the logo resource has been placed at the bottom of the external links section as SortItOutSI already had a link. And finally, where did you get your 'millions of files' from? If you refer to the title of Susie, then that means the number of times files have been downloaded; not the number of files available.
Reply: I am perfectly aware of the bottom section. Yet I think the patching thing should be pointed out separately. Merely giving some link doesn't give a reader full info that FM can be patched etc. I am sorry for maybe not doing it properly but I still think a separate Patching section should be added.
Please discuss.
Ok, solved.
FYI: I have sent an email to Kevin Toms asking if we can use the pictures of the Football Manager screenshots on his website.
I think it'd be great if we can add some more history to the game instead of a brief paragraph. I think that the game that started it all deserves much more than that!
I've also sent an email to Marc Duffy at SI asking for permission to use the FM 2006 boxart as the picture for the infobox, as most detailed articles on videogames have this instead of a screenie.
Until I get approval, the image lies here waiting to be used. The licencing may need altering as it's set as DVD cover art (there wasn't anything for videogames (except screenshots)).-- Dan (Talk) 10:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I have received an email confirming that he has no problems with the use of Football Manager screenshots on the site. He is, however, unsure of the copyright situation:
Sure, Dan, I have no problems with you using pictures. Not sure what the copyright situation is, if that is what you are asking. If you have questions, or things you want to find out from me for your article, please ask. Kind regards, Kevin
-- Dan (Talk)| @ 17:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
What exactly is allowed in here? If we were to include all links to every single FM site it would not exactly make the article look nice, nor help with its encyclopedic content, and I think it should be limited to the more "well-known" ones (MC and perhaps Susie)? NSL E ( T+ C) 00:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
I think the links to fan sites are useful, because SI official site is quite crappy. So, I'm for option 2, even though I have no idea what an "affiliate" site is. Grue 09:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Looks like the vote's over then - unless there's a last minute rush of votes for option one. Ukdan999 19:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
P.S. I stand by what I say about some sites looking like nothing more than glorified blogs.-- Dan (Talk)| @ 22:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Also worth a try is [www.footyman.com]. It is extremely popular and well run. The site contains infromation on the beloved game with players, staff and hints to give you a head start in Football Manager. Try it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.107.68 ( talk) 17:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone have a definite linkable source to 'prove' that the German, Dutch and Japanese teams don't pick real players?
I'm asking this because about 10% of all edits (and nearly 100% or all reverts) relate to people adding and/or removing countries that pick actual players.
It's getting tedious to see them pop up along with relatively fast reverts (generally done by NSLE
) and a source would put these revert problems to rest for good (or until the next version of FM is released!
).
Cheers -- Dan (Talk)| @ 00:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
In my version I have all of them enabled with some lnc hacking, but I was sure that Dutch team is disabled by default. Grue 07:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
The Dutch team do pick the real players. They are a licensed side on the game, and are the only national team to have their kits and logo on the game. Adam_Scott_89
Hey all!
After Sports Interactive's recent announcement regarding Football Manager 2007, I felt that enough information was available to start an article which could, at least, outline the announcement of the game details with quotes.-- Dan (Talk)| @ 13:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Where on earth did you get the release date of October 20? Isn't the official release set on Christmas 2006? You better verify this allegation. -- 213.250.12.139 12:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Fm08boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 13:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Football Manager ad.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
The information in the article is incorrect. The Brazilian national leagues available in Football Manager Handheld are the Série A and the Série B. -- Carioca ( talk) 20:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Football Manager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sigames.com/content/football-manager-onlineWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)