![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Folkmoot was copied or moved into Folkmoot USA with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I would like to create an article about the international festival in Waynesville, North Carolina. The templates, links and such probably won't be useful. The definition of the word "Folkmoot" probably would be. There's so little here I don't see the point in keeping the article's original purpose. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Actually, the official name of the Festival is Folkmoot USA. I'll make that a hatnote. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
My idea was to use the text of this article, as a complete description of where the name came from. But Folkmoot USA is the formal name of the event. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
well, Moot (Anglo-Saxon) is a possible article, no argument about that. Unless and until somebody writes it, "moot" should just be subsumed under thing (assembly). I don't think we disagree about anything. For a quick fix, there can be an "Anglo-Saxon moot" section at the thing article, and as soon as somebody expands this enough for a standalone article, it can be branched out. -- dab (𒁳) 11:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Folkmoot was copied or moved into Folkmoot USA with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I would like to create an article about the international festival in Waynesville, North Carolina. The templates, links and such probably won't be useful. The definition of the word "Folkmoot" probably would be. There's so little here I don't see the point in keeping the article's original purpose. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Actually, the official name of the Festival is Folkmoot USA. I'll make that a hatnote. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
My idea was to use the text of this article, as a complete description of where the name came from. But Folkmoot USA is the formal name of the event. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
well, Moot (Anglo-Saxon) is a possible article, no argument about that. Unless and until somebody writes it, "moot" should just be subsumed under thing (assembly). I don't think we disagree about anything. For a quick fix, there can be an "Anglo-Saxon moot" section at the thing article, and as soon as somebody expands this enough for a standalone article, it can be branched out. -- dab (𒁳) 11:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)