This topic already exists here Fog collection. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The article provides a wide range of information including the history, components, advantages, disadvantages, and cases of the Fog harvesting system. However, I think the structure of the article needs to be adjusted, and it would be more reasonable to follow the structure of "Applications-Case studies-Recent advances and innovations". Taiki Shuttle ( talk) 13:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I found the topic very interesting and innovative. The article is comprehensive and encyclopedic. The structure is simple, as mostly developed by means of bullet points, but I personally think it works. However, I'm not sure the image here published is actually open-access, since I know the person who made it. I might be mistaken: if so, please provide the online source where you found it. In this regard, references are just a very few. I add the fifth footnote, concerning the application of fog harvesting systems in the built environment, by Maria Giovanna Di Bitonto. Camilla.vi ( talk) 13:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:GLAM/PoliMi/2024 review
There are maybe too many lists in the article, but good job. Xebe22 ( talk) 13:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I think this Wikipedia article provides a detailed explanation of the fog collection system and highlights the key research issues. I suggest adding commonly used research methods to Wikipedia articles to make the content more comprehensive. SDDEZHOUZYC ( talk) 13:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
This topic already exists here Fog collection. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The article provides a wide range of information including the history, components, advantages, disadvantages, and cases of the Fog harvesting system. However, I think the structure of the article needs to be adjusted, and it would be more reasonable to follow the structure of "Applications-Case studies-Recent advances and innovations". Taiki Shuttle ( talk) 13:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I found the topic very interesting and innovative. The article is comprehensive and encyclopedic. The structure is simple, as mostly developed by means of bullet points, but I personally think it works. However, I'm not sure the image here published is actually open-access, since I know the person who made it. I might be mistaken: if so, please provide the online source where you found it. In this regard, references are just a very few. I add the fifth footnote, concerning the application of fog harvesting systems in the built environment, by Maria Giovanna Di Bitonto. Camilla.vi ( talk) 13:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:GLAM/PoliMi/2024 review
There are maybe too many lists in the article, but good job. Xebe22 ( talk) 13:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I think this Wikipedia article provides a detailed explanation of the fog collection system and highlights the key research issues. I suggest adding commonly used research methods to Wikipedia articles to make the content more comprehensive. SDDEZHOUZYC ( talk) 13:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)