From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputing PROD

I'm contesting the PROD for several reasons. The first is that a series or work can still be notable even if the author does not actually have an article. Sometimes they don't because the author isn't individually notable outside of one work, other times it's just that the article hasn't been created or was prematurely deleted because there were no visible sources on the article. I think that PRODing this was a little premature since there are several good sources on the internet. That's my second reason: I found several reviews of the book on various sites that are considered to be RS, such as staff reviews on Mania.com, Booklist, and ANN. There's enough here to where it passes WP:NBOOK. It took a little digging, but the sources were visible when I looked for them. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia:Requested articles/Japan/Anime and Manga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputing PROD

I'm contesting the PROD for several reasons. The first is that a series or work can still be notable even if the author does not actually have an article. Sometimes they don't because the author isn't individually notable outside of one work, other times it's just that the article hasn't been created or was prematurely deleted because there were no visible sources on the article. I think that PRODing this was a little premature since there are several good sources on the internet. That's my second reason: I found several reviews of the book on various sites that are considered to be RS, such as staff reviews on Mania.com, Booklist, and ANN. There's enough here to where it passes WP:NBOOK. It took a little digging, but the sources were visible when I looked for them. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia:Requested articles/Japan/Anime and Manga


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook