(Redirected from
Talk:Florence tramway)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Most of the article comes from the Italian wikipedia ( Tranvia di Firenze) translated and reorganized. I'm working on the translation of the rest of the article. -- Ita140188 ( talk) 15:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 20:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Trams in Florence → Gest (Florence) – First of all is not a tramway but is a light rail. As Dallas light rail page is called DART Light Rail, we should call this with its own name [1] Wind of freedom ( talk) 16:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: The article currently states "The current network operator is GEST", but not that the railway is actually called "Gest". Do you have a source that says what the railway is called? And if it is Gest, is it capitalised or not? jamacfarlane ( talk) 20:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose This is not what it is called. Moreover, the article also deals with previous tramways. If it is a tramway or a light rail is just a matter of definition and is debatable. However, the system is widely called "tranvia", so the current name is appropriate. -- Ita140188 ( talk) 23:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. Doesn't just deal with the current system. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Even if I thought the tram/light rail distinction was important in this case, and even if I ignore the historical section, I am still unconvinced that "Gest" (and especially "Gest (Florence)") is the common-name, or that naming it such would facilitate readers finding the topic. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 06:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
(Redirected from
Talk:Florence tramway)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Most of the article comes from the Italian wikipedia ( Tranvia di Firenze) translated and reorganized. I'm working on the translation of the rest of the article. -- Ita140188 ( talk) 15:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 20:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Trams in Florence → Gest (Florence) – First of all is not a tramway but is a light rail. As Dallas light rail page is called DART Light Rail, we should call this with its own name [1] Wind of freedom ( talk) 16:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: The article currently states "The current network operator is GEST", but not that the railway is actually called "Gest". Do you have a source that says what the railway is called? And if it is Gest, is it capitalised or not? jamacfarlane ( talk) 20:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose This is not what it is called. Moreover, the article also deals with previous tramways. If it is a tramway or a light rail is just a matter of definition and is debatable. However, the system is widely called "tranvia", so the current name is appropriate. -- Ita140188 ( talk) 23:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. Doesn't just deal with the current system. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Even if I thought the tram/light rail distinction was important in this case, and even if I ignore the historical section, I am still unconvinced that "Gest" (and especially "Gest (Florence)") is the common-name, or that naming it such would facilitate readers finding the topic. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 06:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.