![]() | Florence Farr was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add more here in a few. Zos 15:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the stub notice from this article. It is now a very good article and I would suggest putting it forward for Peer Review. Capitalistroadster 13:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I've added extra material I found in the catalog of the University College of London biographical collection. The biography and listing of the sources can be found on the Web at: http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cgi-bin/frames/fulldesc?coll_id=1772&inst_id=13 JMax555 07:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I've been adding more material and citations, and trying to polish the text structure and syntax, to get the article ready for peer review and hopefully elevated in rating. There's a new book coming out next year from Oxford University Press called "The Last Minstrels" about Yeats' and Farr's efforts to promote Irsih lyrical theatre, which should supply some more info about that period of Farr's life. JMax555 09:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I've closed the A-class review because it's been three months with only one support. DrKiernan ( talk) 08:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Should be who not which.
Fragment consider re-writing.
This sentence is awkward reading. Are Yeats and Yates the same person, and is this the his acquaintance she is meeting?
This is a lo-o-o-n-n-g sentence.
This sentence should be two - it contains two seperate ideas, and shouldn't be run on together.
Should't be the actor-manager but only Farr served an eight-month apprenticeship under actor-manager - also this is a very lo-o-o-n-n-g sentence.
Another long sentence. Who was it that introduced Farr to the circles, was it May or Jane?
This sentence could be worded the other way around - there are many she's in the sentence - is it right to assume when Farr was 19 years old, when there are many young ladies mentioned in the sentence?
Next to establishing context, the lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article (e.g. when a related article gives a brief overview of the topic in question). It is even more important here than for the rest of the article that the text be accessible, and consideration should be given to creating interest in reading the whole article (see news style and summary style).
See also Better lead
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
Why are there two bibliographies in this article? I've never seen this in an article - shouldn't they be merged? Hohenloh + 12:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Florence Farr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Florence Farr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Florence Farr was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add more here in a few. Zos 15:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the stub notice from this article. It is now a very good article and I would suggest putting it forward for Peer Review. Capitalistroadster 13:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I've added extra material I found in the catalog of the University College of London biographical collection. The biography and listing of the sources can be found on the Web at: http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cgi-bin/frames/fulldesc?coll_id=1772&inst_id=13 JMax555 07:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I've been adding more material and citations, and trying to polish the text structure and syntax, to get the article ready for peer review and hopefully elevated in rating. There's a new book coming out next year from Oxford University Press called "The Last Minstrels" about Yeats' and Farr's efforts to promote Irsih lyrical theatre, which should supply some more info about that period of Farr's life. JMax555 09:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I've closed the A-class review because it's been three months with only one support. DrKiernan ( talk) 08:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Should be who not which.
Fragment consider re-writing.
This sentence is awkward reading. Are Yeats and Yates the same person, and is this the his acquaintance she is meeting?
This is a lo-o-o-n-n-g sentence.
This sentence should be two - it contains two seperate ideas, and shouldn't be run on together.
Should't be the actor-manager but only Farr served an eight-month apprenticeship under actor-manager - also this is a very lo-o-o-n-n-g sentence.
Another long sentence. Who was it that introduced Farr to the circles, was it May or Jane?
This sentence could be worded the other way around - there are many she's in the sentence - is it right to assume when Farr was 19 years old, when there are many young ladies mentioned in the sentence?
Next to establishing context, the lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article (e.g. when a related article gives a brief overview of the topic in question). It is even more important here than for the rest of the article that the text be accessible, and consideration should be given to creating interest in reading the whole article (see news style and summary style).
See also Better lead
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
Why are there two bibliographies in this article? I've never seen this in an article - shouldn't they be merged? Hohenloh + 12:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Florence Farr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Florence Farr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)