 | This 
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
{{
movereq|flocculent spiral galaxy}}
Flocculent Spiral Galaxy → Flocculent spiral galaxy —
According to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the title of this article should not be capitalized. When it was originally requested at WP:AFC, the title was not capitalized. When it was requested as a speedy at WP:RM, the reasoning was MOS:CAPS.
The speedy move was contested. So here's a full WP:RM.
70.29.208.247 ( talk) 01:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Please indicate your position here, with a support for the proposal, or opposition to it, and a rationale for your position.
- Support as nominator; other galaxy types are similarly not capitalized. 70.29.208.247 ( talk) 01:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support For the reason above. -- Extra999 ( Contact me + contribs) 15:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The search bar ignores cases and capitals. It is unnessisary to change the case--
Alpha Quadrant (
talk)
21:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support and comment Eh? You shouldn't have reverted an admin move anyway. If you wanted to move it, you should have left it alone and contested it at WP:RM. At any rate, it obviously qualifies under WP:CAPS (not MOS:CAPS).
Miracle Pen (
talk)
08:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Reply the manual of style says that Celestial bodies should be capitalized when used as a noun. The title of this article is a noun. I did not know that the user who moved the article was an administrator. I noticed that the page had been moved and that the move was unnessisary so I moved it back to its origional title. Sorry if this caused any problems.--
Alpha Quadrant (
talk)
21:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- What MOS says is that the names of galaxies are proper nouns. "Flocculent spiral galaxy" is not the name of a galaxy; it's the name of a type of galaxy. It's not a proper noun. Miracle Pen ( talk) 02:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Reply the manual of style says that Celestial bodies should be capitalized when used as a noun. The title of this article is a noun. I did not know that the user who moved the article was an administrator. I noticed that the page had been moved and that the move was unnessisary so I moved it back to its origional title. Sorry if this caused any problems.--
Alpha Quadrant (
talk)
21:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support and comment Eh? You shouldn't have reverted an admin move anyway. If you wanted to move it, you should have left it alone and contested it at WP:RM. At any rate, it obviously qualifies under WP:CAPS (not MOS:CAPS).
Miracle Pen (
talk)
08:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and User:Miracle Pen. "Flocculent spiral galaxy" is not a proper noun. --
emerson7
20:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- comment: recommend speedy close. -- emerson7 05:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Use this section for other comments related to the move
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The photo of the Pinwheel in the list of examples looks like an excellent instance of a grand-design spiral, not a flocculent one. So what's it doing here? Jmacwiki ( talk) 05:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Now replaced with M63, which is flocculent. Jmacwiki ( talk) 23:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/25 April 2010
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
|
| This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
{{
movereq|flocculent spiral galaxy}}
Flocculent Spiral Galaxy → Flocculent spiral galaxy —
According to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the title of this article should not be capitalized. When it was originally requested at WP:AFC, the title was not capitalized. When it was requested as a speedy at WP:RM, the reasoning was MOS:CAPS.
The speedy move was contested. So here's a full WP:RM.
70.29.208.247 ( talk) 01:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Please indicate your position here, with a support for the proposal, or opposition to it, and a rationale for your position.
- Support as nominator; other galaxy types are similarly not capitalized. 70.29.208.247 ( talk) 01:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support For the reason above. -- Extra999 ( Contact me + contribs) 15:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The search bar ignores cases and capitals. It is unnessisary to change the case--
Alpha Quadrant (
talk)
21:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support and comment Eh? You shouldn't have reverted an admin move anyway. If you wanted to move it, you should have left it alone and contested it at WP:RM. At any rate, it obviously qualifies under WP:CAPS (not MOS:CAPS).
Miracle Pen (
talk)
08:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Reply the manual of style says that Celestial bodies should be capitalized when used as a noun. The title of this article is a noun. I did not know that the user who moved the article was an administrator. I noticed that the page had been moved and that the move was unnessisary so I moved it back to its origional title. Sorry if this caused any problems.--
Alpha Quadrant (
talk)
21:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- What MOS says is that the names of galaxies are proper nouns. "Flocculent spiral galaxy" is not the name of a galaxy; it's the name of a type of galaxy. It's not a proper noun. Miracle Pen ( talk) 02:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Reply the manual of style says that Celestial bodies should be capitalized when used as a noun. The title of this article is a noun. I did not know that the user who moved the article was an administrator. I noticed that the page had been moved and that the move was unnessisary so I moved it back to its origional title. Sorry if this caused any problems.--
Alpha Quadrant (
talk)
21:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support and comment Eh? You shouldn't have reverted an admin move anyway. If you wanted to move it, you should have left it alone and contested it at WP:RM. At any rate, it obviously qualifies under WP:CAPS (not MOS:CAPS).
Miracle Pen (
talk)
08:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and User:Miracle Pen. "Flocculent spiral galaxy" is not a proper noun. --
emerson7
20:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- comment: recommend speedy close. -- emerson7 05:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Use this section for other comments related to the move
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The photo of the Pinwheel in the list of examples looks like an excellent instance of a grand-design spiral, not a flocculent one. So what's it doing here? Jmacwiki ( talk) 05:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Now replaced with M63, which is flocculent. Jmacwiki ( talk) 23:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/25 April 2010
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)