![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link to Titus Flavius Clemens redirects to the Christian theologian, not the consul as it should. Stephen C. Carlson ( talk) 08:59, 5 October 2006
There should be a note that "Flavius" in the 4th, 5th & IIRC 6th centuries did not refer to the gens Flavia, but was more of a title adopted by people claiming a mid-level status with some kind of military overtones. Benet Salway, in his Journal of Roman Studies article, does an excellent job of explaining how it derived from the dynastic name of Constantine the Great -- & its later use has nothing to do with the gens. -- llywrch ( talk) 03:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
barbarian successor kingdoms of Italy in the lead links to a disambiguation page, and needs to be disambiguated to the germane kingdoms. Cheers! {{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
20:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link to Titus Flavius Clemens redirects to the Christian theologian, not the consul as it should. Stephen C. Carlson ( talk) 08:59, 5 October 2006
There should be a note that "Flavius" in the 4th, 5th & IIRC 6th centuries did not refer to the gens Flavia, but was more of a title adopted by people claiming a mid-level status with some kind of military overtones. Benet Salway, in his Journal of Roman Studies article, does an excellent job of explaining how it derived from the dynastic name of Constantine the Great -- & its later use has nothing to do with the gens. -- llywrch ( talk) 03:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
barbarian successor kingdoms of Italy in the lead links to a disambiguation page, and needs to be disambiguated to the germane kingdoms. Cheers! {{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
20:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)