![]() | Flag of Raleigh, North Carolina has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 11, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Flag of Raleigh, North Carolina appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 06:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Created by Jordano53 ( talk). Self-nominated at 21:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC).
I've added this flag to /info/en/?search=Flags_whose_reverse_differs_from_the_obverse - it lacks an image of the reverse, hopefully someone can rectify that. - Metalello talk 21:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: No Great Shaker ( talk · contribs) 15:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'll be happy to do this review. Will be back soon. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll be using this list to complete the review. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I've done a preliminary read of the article which is stable and I'm happy with the images which are appropriate and seem to be free of any problems. It therefore passes GACR#5 and GACR#6. I need to read it in more depth and hope to have time for that tomorrow but there are a couple of points in the meantime:
1. Richmond isn't on the coast so should it be termed an East Coast City? The state may have an Atlantic shoreline but the city does not.
2. "Sir Raleigh" is incorrect. You can call him Sir Walter Raleigh in full or just Sir Walter, once you have established who he was.
Back soon. All the best and stay safe. No Great Shaker ( talk) 21:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jordano, and thanks for the amendments. I've read the article again and it's fine. Very interesting, informative, well-written, well-sourced and a good article. Well done and I'm promoting it to GA. All the best and stay safe. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Flag of Raleigh, North Carolina has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 11, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Flag of Raleigh, North Carolina appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 06:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Created by Jordano53 ( talk). Self-nominated at 21:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC).
I've added this flag to /info/en/?search=Flags_whose_reverse_differs_from_the_obverse - it lacks an image of the reverse, hopefully someone can rectify that. - Metalello talk 21:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: No Great Shaker ( talk · contribs) 15:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'll be happy to do this review. Will be back soon. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll be using this list to complete the review. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I've done a preliminary read of the article which is stable and I'm happy with the images which are appropriate and seem to be free of any problems. It therefore passes GACR#5 and GACR#6. I need to read it in more depth and hope to have time for that tomorrow but there are a couple of points in the meantime:
1. Richmond isn't on the coast so should it be termed an East Coast City? The state may have an Atlantic shoreline but the city does not.
2. "Sir Raleigh" is incorrect. You can call him Sir Walter Raleigh in full or just Sir Walter, once you have established who he was.
Back soon. All the best and stay safe. No Great Shaker ( talk) 21:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jordano, and thanks for the amendments. I've read the article again and it's fine. Very interesting, informative, well-written, well-sourced and a good article. Well done and I'm promoting it to GA. All the best and stay safe. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)