![]() | Flag of Prince Edward Island has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
what does the lion represent on the Pei flag
This article shows an image of a hypothetical flag, but it isn't mentioned in the text. What is it? Bazonka ( talk) 18:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Amakuru (
talk)
08:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
5x expanded by Bloom6132 ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Amitchell125 ( talk · contribs) 14:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Happy to review the article.
"while many consider the Red Oak to be the tree on the Provincial Coat-of-Arms, this has never been formally recognized."Would it be better if I changed the sentence to "is reportedly Quercus rubra"? — Bloom6132 ( talk) 00:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Etriusus ( talk · contribs) 04:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
I'll take this on, giving a customary @
Amitchell125: in the event they want to chime in. Right off the bat, I can see that all the changes from the last GAN were undone for some reason; revert edits made for GAN that has now been failed – start with clean slate
. I don't exactly understand why this was done and the page will quick fail if I have to rehash all the same suggestions that happened in GA1. Please let me know if there is a reason that revert was done, I won't go further unless there's a good reason or the changes are restored.
Note: I just came from a cluster at WP:ANI and I'm probably going to be a bit crabbier than usual, so please be patient with me. Etrius ( Us) 04:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
"are the only aspects that should be considered when assessing whether to pass or fail an article. All other comments designed to help improve the article are to be encouraged during the review process but should not be mandated as part of the assessment"(my emphasis). — Bloom6132 ( talk) 06:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
A reviewer who has not previously reviewed the article determines that any issues from previous GA nominations have not been adequately considered.
The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
![]() | Flag of Prince Edward Island has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
what does the lion represent on the Pei flag
This article shows an image of a hypothetical flag, but it isn't mentioned in the text. What is it? Bazonka ( talk) 18:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Amakuru (
talk)
08:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
5x expanded by Bloom6132 ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Amitchell125 ( talk · contribs) 14:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Happy to review the article.
"while many consider the Red Oak to be the tree on the Provincial Coat-of-Arms, this has never been formally recognized."Would it be better if I changed the sentence to "is reportedly Quercus rubra"? — Bloom6132 ( talk) 00:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Etriusus ( talk · contribs) 04:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
I'll take this on, giving a customary @
Amitchell125: in the event they want to chime in. Right off the bat, I can see that all the changes from the last GAN were undone for some reason; revert edits made for GAN that has now been failed – start with clean slate
. I don't exactly understand why this was done and the page will quick fail if I have to rehash all the same suggestions that happened in GA1. Please let me know if there is a reason that revert was done, I won't go further unless there's a good reason or the changes are restored.
Note: I just came from a cluster at WP:ANI and I'm probably going to be a bit crabbier than usual, so please be patient with me. Etrius ( Us) 04:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
"are the only aspects that should be considered when assessing whether to pass or fail an article. All other comments designed to help improve the article are to be encouraged during the review process but should not be mandated as part of the assessment"(my emphasis). — Bloom6132 ( talk) 06:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
A reviewer who has not previously reviewed the article determines that any issues from previous GA nominations have not been adequately considered.
The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.