![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Fitzwilliam Sonatas appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,026 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Editor User:Shoemaker's Holiday has just added a very understandable "clarify" query, which I think suggests that the editors currently working on this article need to have a pow-wow. This article started out being about Thurston Dart's Fitzwilliam Sonatas, and has quickly run into the confusion and contradiction caused by the fact that Dart shortened Handel's D minor sonata to five movements, and created a third sonata out of the remaining two movements (in reverse order) plus an unrelated movement, with a double composed by Dart himself. I am on the verge of adding that there is yet another "Fitzwilliam" Sonata—the one in G major—that has been published (twice) as "Fitzwilliam Sonata no. 3" for recorder and continuo (though it is the earliest of the three by several years at least), not to mention other publications as "Violin Sonata in G Major". Before I do so, however, I would like some input from other active editors. It seem to me that the article ought to be based on the sonatas as Handel wrote them (three unrelated sonatas, composed over a span of as much as twenty years), rather than the 1948 arrangement of two of them by Dart, divided into three—though of course that arrangement needs not only to be mentioned, but described in some detail. What do you think?— Jerome Kohl ( talk) 04:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) BA 4259, ISMN M-006-52192-0{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) BA 4226, ISMN M-006-44628-5-- Vejvančický ( talk) 10:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Fitzwilliam Sonatas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Fitzwilliam Sonatas appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,026 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Editor User:Shoemaker's Holiday has just added a very understandable "clarify" query, which I think suggests that the editors currently working on this article need to have a pow-wow. This article started out being about Thurston Dart's Fitzwilliam Sonatas, and has quickly run into the confusion and contradiction caused by the fact that Dart shortened Handel's D minor sonata to five movements, and created a third sonata out of the remaining two movements (in reverse order) plus an unrelated movement, with a double composed by Dart himself. I am on the verge of adding that there is yet another "Fitzwilliam" Sonata—the one in G major—that has been published (twice) as "Fitzwilliam Sonata no. 3" for recorder and continuo (though it is the earliest of the three by several years at least), not to mention other publications as "Violin Sonata in G Major". Before I do so, however, I would like some input from other active editors. It seem to me that the article ought to be based on the sonatas as Handel wrote them (three unrelated sonatas, composed over a span of as much as twenty years), rather than the 1948 arrangement of two of them by Dart, divided into three—though of course that arrangement needs not only to be mentioned, but described in some detail. What do you think?— Jerome Kohl ( talk) 04:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) BA 4259, ISMN M-006-52192-0{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) BA 4226, ISMN M-006-44628-5-- Vejvančický ( talk) 10:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Fitzwilliam Sonatas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)