This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2015. The result of the discussion was redirect to History of the Philippines (1521–1571).

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tambayan Philippines: History Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This redirect is supported by the Philippine history task force (assessed as Top-importance). History This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles

I have placed an {{ original research}} hatnote in this article. It appears to combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. (see WP:SYNTH) Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply

@ Wtmitchell: this is close to original research, but mostly fringe theory. I nominated it for deletion. Feel free to weigh in. -- bender235 ( talk) 15:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC) reply