This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. India: Haryana / History / Protected areas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana. This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup. This article is supported by the Protected areas of India workgroup. This article was last assessed in April 2022.

Working through the copy edits in chunks. Got up to the Royal Palace section. I'm not sure about keeping the paragraph on artillery in the History section. I believe the original author included it because the fort was made obsolete by artillery, but couldn't find any sources to support my hunch. Nben7070 ( talk) 11:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC) reply

I've completed the request for copyedit, save for perhaps some minor style/grammar errors I might have missed and assessed the article a Low-importance C-class. I would argue for B-class if statements or claims lacking in citations were provided and the list of references expanded. ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 17:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply