This article was nominated for deletion on 5 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). Chemistry Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Since this program is now called Firefly, and not PC GAMESS anymore, I suggest it is time that it renamed to, I suggest Firefly (computer program). Does anyone have a better suggestion?

I also see that the importance to the two Projects above has just been changed from "Low" to "Mid". I do not think that is justified, particularly for the Computing Project. It is essentially a program used by chemists but only a small number of them will have heard of it. GAMESS (US) is more widely known and that is "Mid" for the Chemistry Project and "Low" for the Computing Project. I am changing the Computing Project back to "Low", but waiting for comment here on the Chemistry Project. -- Bduke (Discussion) 21:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Support both. P99am ( talk) 11:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC) reply