![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I couldn't see any failure to demonstrate a worldview, so have removed the category. Anyone who disagrees might like to post their reasons so we can improve the articles.
El T
06:54, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
There is a deficiency here of a global view: There is nothing about fire stations in developing countries, where equipment used in developed countries is not used. With regards to developed countries fire stations (which the article currently appears to describe) there is still a lack of balance: for example "ladder 49" and other references seem to be specifically of the USA. --jrleighton 12:35, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Why is it that "Fire Department" redirects here? This makes no sense. I think there should be a seperate article for "Fire Department".—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kormerant ( talk • contribs) date.
is the word firehItalic textĎďĚr̝all used in a particular region? NorthernThunder ( talk) 00:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The history section remarks how insurance companies set up firefighting services to protect their clients' property, but would sometimes block a rival company's efforts. Then the section stops without explaining how this rather dastardly behaviour was resolved - "reason prevailed"? Or did the city or a higher level of government step in and mandate fire fighting as a public protective service? Please continue the story! GBC ( talk) 05:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I couldn't see any failure to demonstrate a worldview, so have removed the category. Anyone who disagrees might like to post their reasons so we can improve the articles.
El T
06:54, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
There is a deficiency here of a global view: There is nothing about fire stations in developing countries, where equipment used in developed countries is not used. With regards to developed countries fire stations (which the article currently appears to describe) there is still a lack of balance: for example "ladder 49" and other references seem to be specifically of the USA. --jrleighton 12:35, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Why is it that "Fire Department" redirects here? This makes no sense. I think there should be a seperate article for "Fire Department".—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kormerant ( talk • contribs) date.
is the word firehItalic textĎďĚr̝all used in a particular region? NorthernThunder ( talk) 00:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The history section remarks how insurance companies set up firefighting services to protect their clients' property, but would sometimes block a rival company's efforts. Then the section stops without explaining how this rather dastardly behaviour was resolved - "reason prevailed"? Or did the city or a higher level of government step in and mandate fire fighting as a public protective service? Please continue the story! GBC ( talk) 05:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)