![]() | Fine Gael was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
In case someone is interested in improving the article, it currently doesn't appear to cover the party's views on climate, the environment and related regulations. — Paleo Neonate – 20:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Considering how other political party articles such as People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, Scottish National Party, Social Democratic Party of Germany, or Venstre (Denmark) are written on Wikipedia, the obvious and most used format for the History of a political party should be a summarised, condensed version of the party's history. What's currently there is a wall of text punctuated by dates. I don't think it's good at all and it's come across as if the article is avoiding explaining the history of the party. The history section for the Fine Gael article should be a shorter summary of what's contained in the History of Fine Gael article.
It doesn't need to be extensive, especially at first, because that would require a herculean effort on behalf of one person to do, but even if it was switched to a simple two-paragraph summary of the party's history, that could be used by future editors as a base to expand and flesh out that section. CeltBrowne ( talk) 02:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Someone is repeatedly claiming that Fine Gael is not a christian democratic party. Unfortunately, (s)he decided to back that up with a column and a very conservative magazine. Both sources are in my opinion unsuitable for a stance on a controversial subject. So I have reverted the edit. Note: this also touches that discussion about abortion and abortion rights. The Banner talk 23:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
I think Christian Democracy is not really important to describe FG Braganza ( talk) 12:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Fine gael for one was founded by a fascist leader, quite a famous fascist leader called eoin o'duffy, i don't believe its disputed not to mention fine gaels name comes from the blueshirts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judeobasquelanguage ( talk • contribs) 08:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Fine Gael was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
In case someone is interested in improving the article, it currently doesn't appear to cover the party's views on climate, the environment and related regulations. — Paleo Neonate – 20:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Considering how other political party articles such as People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, Scottish National Party, Social Democratic Party of Germany, or Venstre (Denmark) are written on Wikipedia, the obvious and most used format for the History of a political party should be a summarised, condensed version of the party's history. What's currently there is a wall of text punctuated by dates. I don't think it's good at all and it's come across as if the article is avoiding explaining the history of the party. The history section for the Fine Gael article should be a shorter summary of what's contained in the History of Fine Gael article.
It doesn't need to be extensive, especially at first, because that would require a herculean effort on behalf of one person to do, but even if it was switched to a simple two-paragraph summary of the party's history, that could be used by future editors as a base to expand and flesh out that section. CeltBrowne ( talk) 02:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Someone is repeatedly claiming that Fine Gael is not a christian democratic party. Unfortunately, (s)he decided to back that up with a column and a very conservative magazine. Both sources are in my opinion unsuitable for a stance on a controversial subject. So I have reverted the edit. Note: this also touches that discussion about abortion and abortion rights. The Banner talk 23:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
I think Christian Democracy is not really important to describe FG Braganza ( talk) 12:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Fine gael for one was founded by a fascist leader, quite a famous fascist leader called eoin o'duffy, i don't believe its disputed not to mention fine gaels name comes from the blueshirts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judeobasquelanguage ( talk • contribs) 08:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)