This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: The page has been moved to "Find (Windows)". Even though there was no oppose to any particular title here, there was a clear consensus that the page needs to be moved. Given the situation/discussion at Talk:Find (Unix)#Requested move 15 September 2017, and per WP:NCDAB; the title "Find" being a disambiguation, and moving the respective command articles to "Find (Windows)", and "Find (Unix)" is the most logical choice. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Find (command) →
Find (Windows) – See related RM at
Talk:Find i.e. proposed move to Find (Unix). Both of these articles with roughly equal page views are Find "commands" but the DOS/Windows command is completely different to the Unix command.
Find (DOS) can redirect to (Windows) or vice-versa.
In ictu oculi (
talk)
06:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
If there are several possible choices for parenthetical disambiguation, use the same disambiguating phrase already commonly used ... if any. Otherwise, choose whichever is simpler. For example, use "(mythology)" rather than "(mythological figure)". I find [ sic] it pretty obvious that titles "find (Unix)" and "find (Windows)" refer to some feature or command of respective operating systems, so "command" is rather redundant. No such user ( talk) 20:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: The page has been moved to "Find (Windows)". Even though there was no oppose to any particular title here, there was a clear consensus that the page needs to be moved. Given the situation/discussion at Talk:Find (Unix)#Requested move 15 September 2017, and per WP:NCDAB; the title "Find" being a disambiguation, and moving the respective command articles to "Find (Windows)", and "Find (Unix)" is the most logical choice. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Find (command) →
Find (Windows) – See related RM at
Talk:Find i.e. proposed move to Find (Unix). Both of these articles with roughly equal page views are Find "commands" but the DOS/Windows command is completely different to the Unix command.
Find (DOS) can redirect to (Windows) or vice-versa.
In ictu oculi (
talk)
06:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
If there are several possible choices for parenthetical disambiguation, use the same disambiguating phrase already commonly used ... if any. Otherwise, choose whichever is simpler. For example, use "(mythology)" rather than "(mythological figure)". I find [ sic] it pretty obvious that titles "find (Unix)" and "find (Windows)" refer to some feature or command of respective operating systems, so "command" is rather redundant. No such user ( talk) 20:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)