This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Final statement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Final statement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
I have merged content from Last dying speeches, which now redirects here. From Talk:Last dying speeches note the following comments. jnestorius( talk) 17:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
...consisted, essentially, of a kind of definition of the term "final statement", followed by a long, long list of things that were considered "final statements". That is not how we write articles. Besides the matter of original research, for which the article was tagged four years ago (a matter that subsequent editors who added more material did not address), there is the problem that this is simply not how we write articles. Imagine if we wrote Film or Government or K-pop that way. So while Dmol reverted saying "no consensus", they failed to address the problems or the argument. It is worth noting that the entire article seems to be redundant to List of last words--which unfortunately has the exact same problem. Drmies ( talk) 21:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Final statement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Final statement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
I have merged content from Last dying speeches, which now redirects here. From Talk:Last dying speeches note the following comments. jnestorius( talk) 17:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
...consisted, essentially, of a kind of definition of the term "final statement", followed by a long, long list of things that were considered "final statements". That is not how we write articles. Besides the matter of original research, for which the article was tagged four years ago (a matter that subsequent editors who added more material did not address), there is the problem that this is simply not how we write articles. Imagine if we wrote Film or Government or K-pop that way. So while Dmol reverted saying "no consensus", they failed to address the problems or the argument. It is worth noting that the entire article seems to be redundant to List of last words--which unfortunately has the exact same problem. Drmies ( talk) 21:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)