This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Its clearly considered as one, it is X-Play's top must play RPG as well as #9 on IGN's Best Games Ever 2007. Gamespy called it mandatory gaming. If this language isn't allowed on this page, than remove "one of the greatest games of all time" from Final Fantasy IV's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.16.199.68 ( talk) 17:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
In the article, it menins how FF6 characters have reoccurred in other games by Square Enix, but I certainly don't remember any of the characters being used in any of the Kingdom Hearts games, and I've played all three released in the US. Frankly, it should be deleted. Caterfree10 ( talk) 14:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Are there any plans to remake this game for a seventh generation video game console, like the PS3? Hellcat fighter ( talk) 16:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Same as on Talk:Final Fantasy IV#Merging of Final Fantasy Collection. I've merged the information in the Reception section, but I don't know if it flows well this way. I've noticed this section is slightly incomplete here, with a a comment about the sales figure of the game hidden because of a lack of reliable source. Anyway, the recurring problem with the Reception sections of games with multiple re-releases is that we don't really know whether the information should be given release by release or if everything should be blended together... I mean, if the order should be:
Or if it should be:
The current order used in the various articles seems fairly inconsistent (in this one at least). The early FF FAs may need some serious revising in this area in terms of prose and standardization. Thoughts? Kariteh ( talk) 09:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
As far as I can see, the following images fail WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#1, with the overarching "overuse" policy of WP:NFCC#3a also involved here.
I have not mentioned the first screenshot because it could be argued that it is illustrating the "look and feel" of the game, although technically it could well fail NFCC as well. Black Kite 18:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I believe that the Usa release date for the Gameboy Advance version was February 5th 2006. Here's a source... http://www.rpgamer.com/games/release.cgi Go there and select Gameboy Advance games for Usa. :-) Dragonblades ( talk) 12:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I was on the Final Fantasy VII article, when I clicked on a link entitled "See Also: Final Fantasy VI#Interactive CG Game" Some nutter calling himself "The Zodiac" has created a page with the above name, and completely hacked it. The background is black, an most of the screen is full of Japanese writing. When I click on discussion, it brings me to the Final Fantasy VI talk page, so I thought I'd comlain here. The Zodiac writes: 'The Zodiac talking. Tell the other websites that they are in for a big treat. Tomorrow I will be spreading my reign, but digress, I will not leave you, because you provide me with such comfort. I think you people should put little 申 boxes on your pages, because I own this website now'. As I said before, a complete nutter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrnibbles123 ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
The article is a massive repetition of the plot and character section of this article, and has about a paragraph of reliable sourced information that could be placed here, strengthening this article and eliminating a huge permanent stub. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep but improve The cast of this Final Fantasy is one of the first to called iconic and notable. The rest of the Final Fantasy games from this one down have a list of characters, as do the characters several other video games. I can understand some of the older Final Fantasy games with characters that are less noticable, but I honestly cannot see why this one cannot be brought up to a better, more suitable level. Fenrir-of-the-Shadows ( talk) 19:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
67.187.103.117 ( talk) 09:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep and improve on the grounds that the characters from FFVI are somewhat notable, but both this article and the character list are of some considerable length. Merging would most likely result in a loss of information, especially as the article which once described FFVI's world has been replaced with a simple redirect and none of its content actually merged in here. I fear that the same would happen to the characters article; in fact I'll go so far as to say that a successful merge proposal would pretty much be a death sentence for the content of the characters article. -- coldacid ( talk| contrib) 04:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I clicked on the citation and it just took me to a game review which says exactly the same thing without elabouration. The only confusion I can think of is Relm/Shadow in the cave in the second part of the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.219.63 ( talk) 06:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Its clearly considered as one, it is X-Play's top must play RPG as well as #9 on IGN's Best Games Ever 2007. Gamespy called it mandatory gaming. If this language isn't allowed on this page, than remove "one of the greatest games of all time" from Final Fantasy IV's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.16.199.68 ( talk) 17:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
In the article, it menins how FF6 characters have reoccurred in other games by Square Enix, but I certainly don't remember any of the characters being used in any of the Kingdom Hearts games, and I've played all three released in the US. Frankly, it should be deleted. Caterfree10 ( talk) 14:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Are there any plans to remake this game for a seventh generation video game console, like the PS3? Hellcat fighter ( talk) 16:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Same as on Talk:Final Fantasy IV#Merging of Final Fantasy Collection. I've merged the information in the Reception section, but I don't know if it flows well this way. I've noticed this section is slightly incomplete here, with a a comment about the sales figure of the game hidden because of a lack of reliable source. Anyway, the recurring problem with the Reception sections of games with multiple re-releases is that we don't really know whether the information should be given release by release or if everything should be blended together... I mean, if the order should be:
Or if it should be:
The current order used in the various articles seems fairly inconsistent (in this one at least). The early FF FAs may need some serious revising in this area in terms of prose and standardization. Thoughts? Kariteh ( talk) 09:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
As far as I can see, the following images fail WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#1, with the overarching "overuse" policy of WP:NFCC#3a also involved here.
I have not mentioned the first screenshot because it could be argued that it is illustrating the "look and feel" of the game, although technically it could well fail NFCC as well. Black Kite 18:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I believe that the Usa release date for the Gameboy Advance version was February 5th 2006. Here's a source... http://www.rpgamer.com/games/release.cgi Go there and select Gameboy Advance games for Usa. :-) Dragonblades ( talk) 12:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I was on the Final Fantasy VII article, when I clicked on a link entitled "See Also: Final Fantasy VI#Interactive CG Game" Some nutter calling himself "The Zodiac" has created a page with the above name, and completely hacked it. The background is black, an most of the screen is full of Japanese writing. When I click on discussion, it brings me to the Final Fantasy VI talk page, so I thought I'd comlain here. The Zodiac writes: 'The Zodiac talking. Tell the other websites that they are in for a big treat. Tomorrow I will be spreading my reign, but digress, I will not leave you, because you provide me with such comfort. I think you people should put little 申 boxes on your pages, because I own this website now'. As I said before, a complete nutter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrnibbles123 ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
The article is a massive repetition of the plot and character section of this article, and has about a paragraph of reliable sourced information that could be placed here, strengthening this article and eliminating a huge permanent stub. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep but improve The cast of this Final Fantasy is one of the first to called iconic and notable. The rest of the Final Fantasy games from this one down have a list of characters, as do the characters several other video games. I can understand some of the older Final Fantasy games with characters that are less noticable, but I honestly cannot see why this one cannot be brought up to a better, more suitable level. Fenrir-of-the-Shadows ( talk) 19:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
67.187.103.117 ( talk) 09:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep and improve on the grounds that the characters from FFVI are somewhat notable, but both this article and the character list are of some considerable length. Merging would most likely result in a loss of information, especially as the article which once described FFVI's world has been replaced with a simple redirect and none of its content actually merged in here. I fear that the same would happen to the characters article; in fact I'll go so far as to say that a successful merge proposal would pretty much be a death sentence for the content of the characters article. -- coldacid ( talk| contrib) 04:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I clicked on the citation and it just took me to a game review which says exactly the same thing without elabouration. The only confusion I can think of is Relm/Shadow in the cave in the second part of the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.219.63 ( talk) 06:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)