This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met This article is supported by the aircraft project. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The text makes reference to the extremely low aspect ratio of this design (3.0). The AR computed from the wing data given below is 3.51, still extremely low but not as bad as the text indicates. AR = (wingspan)^2 / (wing area) = (22.416667)^2/143 = 3.514 Raymondwinn ( talk) 12:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Looks like you forgot about the width of the fuselage. Please don't insert your own conclusions into articles. -- Rlandmann ( talk) 05:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply