![]() | The corresponding article uses material copied and pasted from other pages, and is therefore likely to become outdated over time. Please transclude relevant material from other pages so that it will remain synced. The following reason was given: The table of pharaohs should be transcluded from list of pharaohs to prevent content forking, pending discussion on the improvement of that article. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why isn't Sheshi listed here? His article says he was a fifteenth dynasty ruler. P Ingerson ( talk) 16:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Tenth dynasty of Egypt - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 23:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi
Dimadick, you reverted my attempt to redirect this article to Hyksos with the explanation None of the rulers and their identification is covered in the Hyksos article
. However, there is an entire section on this, see
Hyksos#Rulers.----
Ermenrich (
talk)
17:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
None of the articles on the rulers are linked, their seals are not included, their dates are not included. Everything that the dynasty article has. Dimadick ( talk) 17:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The text that's been added relies heavily on a single work, that of Kim Ryholt and some other works, such as the Encylopedia of Ancient Egypt, which were originally printed in the early 90s. While many of Ryholt's conclusions have been generally accepted (that the sixteenth dynasty aren't Hyksos, for instance, but Thebans) many have not. The study of the second intermediate period has advanced substantially since the 90s due to new archaeological discoveries and new consensus positions.
Just a few examples:
More recent sources are cited at Hyksos in the relevant sections, which include some statements of WP:RS/AC on them as well. Most of the sources can be found via google books, Academia.edu, or JSTOR. I'm also happy to provide sources for each of my points.
I am also somewhat concerned that this now just duplicates information found at Hyksos, but that's probably more of a point for the merger discussion.-- Ermenrich ( talk) 12:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Please see the tag for link to discussion on relevant talkpage. Neatly95 ( talk) 17:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | The corresponding article uses material copied and pasted from other pages, and is therefore likely to become outdated over time. Please transclude relevant material from other pages so that it will remain synced. The following reason was given: The table of pharaohs should be transcluded from list of pharaohs to prevent content forking, pending discussion on the improvement of that article. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why isn't Sheshi listed here? His article says he was a fifteenth dynasty ruler. P Ingerson ( talk) 16:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Tenth dynasty of Egypt - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 23:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi
Dimadick, you reverted my attempt to redirect this article to Hyksos with the explanation None of the rulers and their identification is covered in the Hyksos article
. However, there is an entire section on this, see
Hyksos#Rulers.----
Ermenrich (
talk)
17:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
None of the articles on the rulers are linked, their seals are not included, their dates are not included. Everything that the dynasty article has. Dimadick ( talk) 17:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The text that's been added relies heavily on a single work, that of Kim Ryholt and some other works, such as the Encylopedia of Ancient Egypt, which were originally printed in the early 90s. While many of Ryholt's conclusions have been generally accepted (that the sixteenth dynasty aren't Hyksos, for instance, but Thebans) many have not. The study of the second intermediate period has advanced substantially since the 90s due to new archaeological discoveries and new consensus positions.
Just a few examples:
More recent sources are cited at Hyksos in the relevant sections, which include some statements of WP:RS/AC on them as well. Most of the sources can be found via google books, Academia.edu, or JSTOR. I'm also happy to provide sources for each of my points.
I am also somewhat concerned that this now just duplicates information found at Hyksos, but that's probably more of a point for the merger discussion.-- Ermenrich ( talk) 12:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Please see the tag for link to discussion on relevant talkpage. Neatly95 ( talk) 17:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)