This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fetus. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fetus at the Reference desk. |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Fetus (biology) page were merged into Fetus. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
The hatnote at the top of this article explains that this article is specifically about human fetuses. However, the lead section of this article seems to imply that the article is about both human and non-human fetuses, even though this contradicts the hatnote at the top of the page. Should this article be renamed to "Human fetus" so that this article's topic will be less ambiguous, and there will be no confusion about the scope of this article? Jarble ( talk) 19:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Very little content on page that is not covered on target page and would fit into an Other animals section Iztwoz ( talk) 07:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fetus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Ought the file of fetus at gestational age 9 weeks be removed as this is a file of an embryo (7 weeks fertilisation age).-- Iztwoz ( talk) 21:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I distinctly remember reading somewhere that the word fetus comes from the Latin word fetere, meaning to stink. I’m assuming this was wrong? 63.231.140.53 ( talk) 20:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some authors [39] argue that fetal pain
In the above quote from the fetal pain section, the space between "some authors" and the reference ought to be removed. 122.150.71.249 ( talk) 06:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fetus. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fetus at the Reference desk. |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Fetus (biology) page were merged into Fetus. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
The hatnote at the top of this article explains that this article is specifically about human fetuses. However, the lead section of this article seems to imply that the article is about both human and non-human fetuses, even though this contradicts the hatnote at the top of the page. Should this article be renamed to "Human fetus" so that this article's topic will be less ambiguous, and there will be no confusion about the scope of this article? Jarble ( talk) 19:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Very little content on page that is not covered on target page and would fit into an Other animals section Iztwoz ( talk) 07:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fetus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Ought the file of fetus at gestational age 9 weeks be removed as this is a file of an embryo (7 weeks fertilisation age).-- Iztwoz ( talk) 21:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I distinctly remember reading somewhere that the word fetus comes from the Latin word fetere, meaning to stink. I’m assuming this was wrong? 63.231.140.53 ( talk) 20:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some authors [39] argue that fetal pain
In the above quote from the fetal pain section, the space between "some authors" and the reference ought to be removed. 122.150.71.249 ( talk) 06:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)