From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.daytonhistorybooks.com/wildnight.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore ( talk) 09:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Note: the above link reproduces an article published in 1932 and therefore still in copyright. I have consequently removed the entire section, The Washington Courthouse Riots, which was pasted in verbatim from the source.

Further issues

The rest of this article is clearly pasted from a variety of sources which are off-line. Many of them may well be out of copyright, but it is plagiarism not to acknowledge clearly that the material is incorporated verbatim. Because of the type of material pasted, the style of the article is very unencyclopedic and needs serious cleanup and copyediting. Voceditenore ( talk) 09:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I have assumed that the third paragraph is a quote, since the footnote says "quoted from", so I have placed it in <blockquote></blockquote> Please fix this if I was not accurate. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 21:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.daytonhistorybooks.com/wildnight.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore ( talk) 09:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Note: the above link reproduces an article published in 1932 and therefore still in copyright. I have consequently removed the entire section, The Washington Courthouse Riots, which was pasted in verbatim from the source.

Further issues

The rest of this article is clearly pasted from a variety of sources which are off-line. Many of them may well be out of copyright, but it is plagiarism not to acknowledge clearly that the material is incorporated verbatim. Because of the type of material pasted, the style of the article is very unencyclopedic and needs serious cleanup and copyediting. Voceditenore ( talk) 09:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I have assumed that the third paragraph is a quote, since the footnote says "quoted from", so I have placed it in <blockquote></blockquote> Please fix this if I was not accurate. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 21:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook