![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Carolus, why the title in the title? (And why the move without discussion?) As a diplomat and patron of the arts the subject of this entry appears in English-language works of History and Art History as "Ferdinand de Boisschot", occasionally as "Ferdinand de Boisschot, Baron of Saventhem" but never as "Ferdinand de Boisschot, Marquess of Groot-Bijgaarden" (a title he acquired only towards the end of his active life). Nor is there a more famous "Ferdinand de Boisschot" to disambiguate this from. Accordingly, in line with WP:COMMONNAME, this should not be where it currently is. Moving it back to the appropriate title, which thanks to this move has become a redirect, will now take the intervention of an admin. -- Andreas Philopater ( talk) 14:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
So there is a General rule and always exeptions in the UK, wel then there is no rule in the end if in practice there are only exeptions. Simple. please see: Belgian_nobility#Marquises_in_the_Belgian_nobility -- Carolus ( talk) 15:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved per WP:COMMONNAME. DrKay ( talk) 21:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Ferdinand de Boisschot, Baron of Saventhem → Ferdinand de Boisschot – This article was already at the pagename that best conforms to WP:COMMONNAME. It has been moved by Carolus twice in the last two hours to what he regards as a superior "official" name (showing the deference due to noble titles but contravening WP:OFFICIAL). TO conform to the policy on article titles, it should be moved back to the previous name. Doing so now requires an admin's intervention since the moves have rendered the original name a double redirect Andreas Philopater ( talk) 15:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Carolus, why the title in the title? (And why the move without discussion?) As a diplomat and patron of the arts the subject of this entry appears in English-language works of History and Art History as "Ferdinand de Boisschot", occasionally as "Ferdinand de Boisschot, Baron of Saventhem" but never as "Ferdinand de Boisschot, Marquess of Groot-Bijgaarden" (a title he acquired only towards the end of his active life). Nor is there a more famous "Ferdinand de Boisschot" to disambiguate this from. Accordingly, in line with WP:COMMONNAME, this should not be where it currently is. Moving it back to the appropriate title, which thanks to this move has become a redirect, will now take the intervention of an admin. -- Andreas Philopater ( talk) 14:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
So there is a General rule and always exeptions in the UK, wel then there is no rule in the end if in practice there are only exeptions. Simple. please see: Belgian_nobility#Marquises_in_the_Belgian_nobility -- Carolus ( talk) 15:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved per WP:COMMONNAME. DrKay ( talk) 21:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Ferdinand de Boisschot, Baron of Saventhem → Ferdinand de Boisschot – This article was already at the pagename that best conforms to WP:COMMONNAME. It has been moved by Carolus twice in the last two hours to what he regards as a superior "official" name (showing the deference due to noble titles but contravening WP:OFFICIAL). TO conform to the policy on article titles, it should be moved back to the previous name. Doing so now requires an admin's intervention since the moves have rendered the original name a double redirect Andreas Philopater ( talk) 15:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)