Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lingzhi2 ( talk · contribs) 11:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC) reply

• You've been waiting for a while. I'll review this soon. ♦  Lingzhi2  (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC) reply

• The "In popular culture" section is completely unreferenced and by all rights should be deleted. I'll give you some time to find refs.
• Please delete all the other things that won awards, as listed in the awards section. Something about NASA and so on. ♦  Lingzhi2  (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• "drawn international praise for the range of shades offered,[19][20][21][22][23]" and "drew broad enthusiasm.[31][32][33][34][35]". You can't make a broad statement and then back it up by giving many specific examples. That's kinda approaching WP:OR. What you need is to find sources that say what you said... This is also WP:OVERCITE, but the former is a policy (which makes it mandatory), while the latter is an essay (which sorta kinda probably makes it recommended, esp. depending on how much cachet that essay carries). ♦  Lingzhi2  (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• You've got some really high percentages on Earwig's Copyvio Detector. You can use WP:BLAME and The Wayback Machine to show that others copied from Wikipedia instead of vice versa. ♦  Lingzhi2  (talk) 07:29, 30 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Update: Eh? When I posted this two days ago there were some websites with > 70% match; now they are not listed. I dunno if someone added them to an exclusion list, or...what... ♦  Lingzhi2  (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC) reply
• Fail GAN lack of response. Pinged WikiProject also, still no response. ♦  Lingzhi2  (talk) 23:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC) reply