This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The mining press is not the only kind of RS there is; Google news has 9 results for the new title but for the former title. There are 405 results for "Fenix nickel project" in Googlebooks, and 1,220 results in GoogleBooks for "Fenix mine"
I suggest you move it back, if you can override the redirect now in the way; because of the bot-placed template that appeared on teh redirect I don't think I can do it, as I'm not an admin, using revert in the move log. If you can't I'll contact an admin; the mining industry's most common usage is not viable as a title unless it were also common use in writings about the mine...and it's clearly not. Skookum1 ( talk) 09:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Fenix mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I just expanded quite a lot, and I'm done for now, but there could be more on the lawsuits. The lawsuits might even warrant their own article. A search for "choc v hudbay" on google scholar shows a lot of coverage in law journals and the suit has implications for corporate accountability in Canada for offenses overseas. (Rather like Kiobel or Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp. in the US). Larataguera ( talk) 00:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The mining press is not the only kind of RS there is; Google news has 9 results for the new title but for the former title. There are 405 results for "Fenix nickel project" in Googlebooks, and 1,220 results in GoogleBooks for "Fenix mine"
I suggest you move it back, if you can override the redirect now in the way; because of the bot-placed template that appeared on teh redirect I don't think I can do it, as I'm not an admin, using revert in the move log. If you can't I'll contact an admin; the mining industry's most common usage is not viable as a title unless it were also common use in writings about the mine...and it's clearly not. Skookum1 ( talk) 09:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Fenix mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I just expanded quite a lot, and I'm done for now, but there could be more on the lawsuits. The lawsuits might even warrant their own article. A search for "choc v hudbay" on google scholar shows a lot of coverage in law journals and the suit has implications for corporate accountability in Canada for offenses overseas. (Rather like Kiobel or Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp. in the US). Larataguera ( talk) 00:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)