![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Waxworker ( talk · contribs) on 23 May 2021. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The plot synopsis is very nice to see. This section should be given a spoiler warning and divided into episodes, and checked for grammar and clarity. I may check around to see if I can find a good illustrative picture. What else should be done? Wyvern 18:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Image-Fencer of Minerva cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to remove the notability tag at the top of the article. I personally know nothing about this series but it's clear to me that it is well-known. A Google search using "" brought back about 44,000 results in 0.19 seconds. Hippychick 02:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC) --Preceding unsigned comment added by Hippychickali ( talk o contribs)
This is a good place to bring in references, even those which we would not use in the article itself. Please share any you find. Sadly, advertisers have grabbed most of the top Google results.
As of June 2021, I've just discovered that the TV Tropes page has also been deleted; this had a lot more detail and coverage than Wikipedia's rather bloated coverage and it's gone, presumably permanently. A look at https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FencerOfMinerva reveals the deletion leaves behind three red links in other articles and cuts 13 inbound links on their site.
There's an archive copy on the All The Tropes shadow site, although I have my reservations about using the copy as a Wiki article source. https://allthetropes.fandom.com/wiki/Fencer_Of_Minerva
My Anime List has a short synopsis and voice cast listings but nothing particularly interesting. https://myanimelist.net/anime/3074/Minerva_no_Kenshi
I'm not even going to try bringing in Naruto crossover fanfic or Deviantart fan art; there must be web-accessible non-realtime commentary articles that have not yet been deleted, yes? Wyvern ( talk) 08:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
How can we preserve some information for people trying to find it? Deleting all coverage on the internet's most popular general information source is obviously counter-productive.
The argument that this specific anime is not notable enough for its own article has been made - but there is currently no master list for all of Central Park Media 's output. That such a list would be desirable is obvious, and if it existed there would be a reasonable case to be made for merging the various articles on individual works into the master list. This was once a common Wikipedia thing but the current fashion is to simply define a category and automatically list articles tagged as being within that category. That too is fine so long as the articles are allowed to exist... I don't claim to have any answers for the entire Wikipedia style guide, but I will say that while we debate the best way to present factual information we should not make it impossible to find out that information. Wikipedia is the first place people think of coming when they want to find out about something; if we're getting in the way of that we're not doing it right. Wyvern ( talk) 07:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Waxworker ( talk · contribs) on 23 May 2021. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The plot synopsis is very nice to see. This section should be given a spoiler warning and divided into episodes, and checked for grammar and clarity. I may check around to see if I can find a good illustrative picture. What else should be done? Wyvern 18:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Image-Fencer of Minerva cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to remove the notability tag at the top of the article. I personally know nothing about this series but it's clear to me that it is well-known. A Google search using "" brought back about 44,000 results in 0.19 seconds. Hippychick 02:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC) --Preceding unsigned comment added by Hippychickali ( talk o contribs)
This is a good place to bring in references, even those which we would not use in the article itself. Please share any you find. Sadly, advertisers have grabbed most of the top Google results.
As of June 2021, I've just discovered that the TV Tropes page has also been deleted; this had a lot more detail and coverage than Wikipedia's rather bloated coverage and it's gone, presumably permanently. A look at https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FencerOfMinerva reveals the deletion leaves behind three red links in other articles and cuts 13 inbound links on their site.
There's an archive copy on the All The Tropes shadow site, although I have my reservations about using the copy as a Wiki article source. https://allthetropes.fandom.com/wiki/Fencer_Of_Minerva
My Anime List has a short synopsis and voice cast listings but nothing particularly interesting. https://myanimelist.net/anime/3074/Minerva_no_Kenshi
I'm not even going to try bringing in Naruto crossover fanfic or Deviantart fan art; there must be web-accessible non-realtime commentary articles that have not yet been deleted, yes? Wyvern ( talk) 08:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
How can we preserve some information for people trying to find it? Deleting all coverage on the internet's most popular general information source is obviously counter-productive.
The argument that this specific anime is not notable enough for its own article has been made - but there is currently no master list for all of Central Park Media 's output. That such a list would be desirable is obvious, and if it existed there would be a reasonable case to be made for merging the various articles on individual works into the master list. This was once a common Wikipedia thing but the current fashion is to simply define a category and automatically list articles tagged as being within that category. That too is fine so long as the articles are allowed to exist... I don't claim to have any answers for the entire Wikipedia style guide, but I will say that while we debate the best way to present factual information we should not make it impossible to find out that information. Wikipedia is the first place people think of coming when they want to find out about something; if we're getting in the way of that we're not doing it right. Wyvern ( talk) 07:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)