Femoral gland has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 17, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 20:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a properly structured article and I have only a few small suggestions to make.
I look forward to seeing this as a GA very soon. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Great stuff. If you have a moment to review one of mine ... of course I'd be pleased. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 21:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Femoral gland has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 17, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 20:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a properly structured article and I have only a few small suggestions to make.
I look forward to seeing this as a GA very soon. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Great stuff. If you have a moment to review one of mine ... of course I'd be pleased. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 21:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)