This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
awards and
prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
The list headed "HonFInstP" then giving, after each name, "HonFInstP" is awful, really naff and redundant. That's WHY THOSE PEOPLE ARE LISTED THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. Good grief. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.109.201.123 (
talk)
12:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The article also needs to draw a clearer distinction between the Fellowship and Hon. Fellowship, simply because otherwise the article is effectively devoid of any meaningful content whatever.
Don't know a thing about this Institute. Whoever it was that thought it worth making in the first place- and painstakingly added all the vain little post-nominals even though they're not required/ this isn't standard format!- could have put in the effort, surely. As they did not, what we have is what I remarked upon- a virtually worthless article. So it goes. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.109.201.123 (
talk)
09:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I had ten minutes spare so managed to improve the article from the IoP's own site (which raises the question of why no interested party ever bothered to do so), although the fact that it was necessary for me- entirely unrelated to the Institute or indeed to physics- to have spent the time is mildly bothersome. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.109.201.123 (
talk)
10:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
awards and
prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
The list headed "HonFInstP" then giving, after each name, "HonFInstP" is awful, really naff and redundant. That's WHY THOSE PEOPLE ARE LISTED THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. Good grief. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.109.201.123 (
talk)
12:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The article also needs to draw a clearer distinction between the Fellowship and Hon. Fellowship, simply because otherwise the article is effectively devoid of any meaningful content whatever.
Don't know a thing about this Institute. Whoever it was that thought it worth making in the first place- and painstakingly added all the vain little post-nominals even though they're not required/ this isn't standard format!- could have put in the effort, surely. As they did not, what we have is what I remarked upon- a virtually worthless article. So it goes. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.109.201.123 (
talk)
09:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I had ten minutes spare so managed to improve the article from the IoP's own site (which raises the question of why no interested party ever bothered to do so), although the fact that it was necessary for me- entirely unrelated to the Institute or indeed to physics- to have spent the time is mildly bothersome. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.109.201.123 (
talk)
10:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)reply