This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co. was copied or moved into Copyright in compilation with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Do we have a citation for the claim that a recipe is not copyrightable? I don't believe it. Why is a recipe not copyrightable, while software (which is just a recipe) is? I don't see why devising a recipe has any less creativity than, say, devising a poem. -- Doradus 14:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I would say that everything after thuue first paragraph in Implications section should be moved elsewere. It might be relevent in legal world but is not relevant to this article. Copyright consequences as well as similar cases in other countries might go in the article Telephone directory, or (if long enough) in a dedicated article "Copyright on phone directories".
Publications v. Meredith, Matthew Bender v. West and all the rest are subject to their respective articles and do not need here citation beyond inclusion in a bulleted list of articles to see.
Similarly I doubt Feist v. Rural have ever mentioned any debates between the U.S. Congress and E.U., or any of the latter is basing the negotiations purely on the former! Let's keep relevant thing together but separate the barely relevant ones apart. -- Goldie (tell me) 02:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Does Feist bear at all on Major League Baseball's claims to have the right to control how its statistics are used? I've seen efforts to prevent rotisserie leagues from using it, or making money on it. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 02:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co. was copied or moved into Copyright in compilation with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Do we have a citation for the claim that a recipe is not copyrightable? I don't believe it. Why is a recipe not copyrightable, while software (which is just a recipe) is? I don't see why devising a recipe has any less creativity than, say, devising a poem. -- Doradus 14:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I would say that everything after thuue first paragraph in Implications section should be moved elsewere. It might be relevent in legal world but is not relevant to this article. Copyright consequences as well as similar cases in other countries might go in the article Telephone directory, or (if long enough) in a dedicated article "Copyright on phone directories".
Publications v. Meredith, Matthew Bender v. West and all the rest are subject to their respective articles and do not need here citation beyond inclusion in a bulleted list of articles to see.
Similarly I doubt Feist v. Rural have ever mentioned any debates between the U.S. Congress and E.U., or any of the latter is basing the negotiations purely on the former! Let's keep relevant thing together but separate the barely relevant ones apart. -- Goldie (tell me) 02:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Does Feist bear at all on Major League Baseball's claims to have the right to control how its statistics are used? I've seen efforts to prevent rotisserie leagues from using it, or making money on it. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 02:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)