![]() | Federalist No. 26 has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 24, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 00:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hoping to get to this later today! Note: this is my first politics-related GAN, so please bear with me.
𓃦LunaEatsTuna (
💬)
00:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counterintuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons). With that said, I generally find Wikipedia citation guidelines to be unclear and self-contradictory. All other notes have been addressed. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 23:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
The image used is relevant, high quality and copyright-free:
File:Alexander Hamilton A17950.jpg
: valid public domain rationale.All sources used are RS. Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 3, 6, 8, 9 or 11. I had access to refs 6 and 9 via the Wikipedia Library.
Templates, External links, nav and cats good.
![]() | Federalist No. 26 has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 24, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 00:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hoping to get to this later today! Note: this is my first politics-related GAN, so please bear with me.
𓃦LunaEatsTuna (
💬)
00:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counterintuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons). With that said, I generally find Wikipedia citation guidelines to be unclear and self-contradictory. All other notes have been addressed. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 23:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
The image used is relevant, high quality and copyright-free:
File:Alexander Hamilton A17950.jpg
: valid public domain rationale.All sources used are RS. Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 3, 6, 8, 9 or 11. I had access to refs 6 and 9 via the Wikipedia Library.
Templates, External links, nav and cats good.