This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
A fact from Feather (song) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Article is new enough. I count around 2126 characters including spaces, so it is long enough as well. Quality of the article seems to be up to standard. Earwig results seem fine for copyright violations. Hook is both interesting and well cited, I would go with the regular hook. QPQ done. As far as comprehensive goes, it does go into the music video, but the article says almost nothing about the music or lyrics. It is possible to add some information on that? One minor issue: the second sentence of the lead section is not mentioned in the body of text nor cited.
Crispulop (
talk) 22:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Done,
Crispulop. I did find a somewhat juicier hook while doing more research and wanted to add it for your and the promotor's consideration:
Great improvements. I like the ALT2 as well. It is also up to DYK-standards. This one is ready to go!
Crispulop (
talk) 19:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
A fact from Feather (song) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Article is new enough. I count around 2126 characters including spaces, so it is long enough as well. Quality of the article seems to be up to standard. Earwig results seem fine for copyright violations. Hook is both interesting and well cited, I would go with the regular hook. QPQ done. As far as comprehensive goes, it does go into the music video, but the article says almost nothing about the music or lyrics. It is possible to add some information on that? One minor issue: the second sentence of the lead section is not mentioned in the body of text nor cited.
Crispulop (
talk) 22:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Done,
Crispulop. I did find a somewhat juicier hook while doing more research and wanted to add it for your and the promotor's consideration:
Great improvements. I like the ALT2 as well. It is also up to DYK-standards. This one is ready to go!
Crispulop (
talk) 19:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)reply