Should this article be moved to Fear the Walking Dead? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
For the pilot episode:
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 23:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I am too lazy to look up the referenced term's technical definitions, but why does a Wiki editor insist that the premiere's running time is 63 minutes, even though AMC's own website lists its episode length at 90 minutes?-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 15:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
For episode 2:
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 01:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Please, decide once, does that role have the actress in this series?. A day walk into this article and I see that Patricia is in the principal cast, then come back and see that this section of the recurring cast. This is very confusing.-- Philip J Fry • ( talk) 11:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
While this link does say "They watch Mrs. Cruz’s husband attack her in her front yard", it contradicts the content of the episode itself: 1) Alicia, with flashlight, looks out the front window of her mother's house and sees the next-door neighbour—identifiable by the plaid shirt he's seen wearing earlier in the episode while loading water and supplies into the trunk of his car and coughing—shuffling in zombie fashion towards the street, in the direction of the Cruz's home; 2) the man attacking Mrs Cruz is not wearing the shirt Mr Cruz is earlier seen wearing; and (most telling) 3) Alicia distinctly says to her mother as Mrs Cruz screams "Mom, Mr Dawson's hurting them." Thus, the attacker isn't Mr Cruz. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 16:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
For episode 3:
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 03:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Collapsed discussion unrelated to this television series
|
---|
|
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Tonight (10/11/15) on the Talking Dead, it was announced that season 2 would begin February 14, 2016 (of all days!). Can this be worked in somewhere? FriarTuck1981 ( talk) 03:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Due to the large amount of vandalism and illiterate spam coming from IP addresses, I hope that someone who knows what he is doing will request page protection for FTWD's article (like that on TWD's article.) FTWD looks like it is going to be a ratings monster and thus attract spam from every prankster and his mother, so why postpone the inevitable?-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 23:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Because there doesn't appear to be an influx of defacement of vandalism as you seem to imagine. Just as the policies you cited as an excuse to arbitrarily remove an entire segment of talk page including multiple users responses do not exist. If you are new to Wikipedia I strongly suggest you spend more time observing others, reading over ACTUAL policies that exist, and joining some of the communities around about the place. ( Personal attack removed) 121.211.33.244 ( talk) 10:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Am I losing my marbles or have they really already humped the bunk and skipped a week? S01E03 should have released last Sunday, but there appears to be no sign of it. Given the lackluster banality of this TV show and how boringly slow it's progressing, more like a teenage drama attempting to 'bring zombies to teen girls' as opposed to a lateral take or expansion of TWD universe skipping a release date could quite literally be a killing blow for this series. At present I doubt there will be a season 2, but can anyone confirm whether there's just a bit of constipation in the distribution channels to Australia where I am (and pirate websites, too) or whether they really humped the bunk and didn't release episode 3 on time / at all yet? 121.211.56.55 ( talk) 06:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I have reinstated this post, it was arbitrarily removed by User:PhiladelphiaInjustice who seems to be new to Wikipedia and thinks that because I have an inability to communicate without the normal profanity adults use is in breach of some imagined policy. Thankfully wikipedia is not censored, or as an Australian I would find it incredibly hard to write if it were. The post above is even more relevant now after another episode has turned up MIA, so I will reinstate it. 121.211.33.244 ( talk) 10:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
It appears that my above commentary is even more relevant. Another weekend, another missing episode. Given the pedigree of the series when it was announced I originally said that I bet it will be one of those single-season-only-spinoffs because of Hollywood insurance. There is a reason that there are hundreds of spin offs of good pedigree shows that last one season where they're intentionally distributed poorly to cause failure - you can make more money off of one failed season than several successful seasons. Many underwriters will take the gamble, I mean why would a Walking Dead spin off fail? Walking Dead is huge, so a spin off will be well received, you'd have to get M Knight Shamalamadingdong directing it to mess this up, or him AND Lucas! So undoubtedly it was insured for a pretty penny to run into the umpteenth season. Sadly this isn't even a conspiracy, it's something avidly discussed among many film production students the world over, and is a woefully overused tactic by producers to make big bucks in a fire and forget contractual deal. Two weekends in one month with missing episodes truly appears as though they're intentionally attempting to write this TV series off, and the only reason you write off a TV series of good material is if you have a better insurance policy. 121.211.33.244 ( talk) 10:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
We don't need to know when FTWD premiered in every country in the world. TWD's article only lists the U.S. and international premiere dates, as do other I've checked. Also, tedious Australian ratings details about the premiere barely belong in their newspapers, much less on this international encyclopedia.-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 22:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
And just because other show's article have a "Home media section" does not mean that one belongs here if its only entry is not encyclopedic. Please, Wiki is not a newspaper that lists every trivial detail: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a newspaper.-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 22:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Hi
Whats new? and
PhiladelphiaInjustice, while you both present very good arguements as to why the inclusion of when FTWD premiered in particular countries is or is not necessary on the article, my third opinion will ultimately side with
PhiladelphiaInjstice. This is mainly due to the general ideas behind
What Wikipedia is not. However,
Whats new? raises some very good points as to its inclusion on the basis that it does provide addtional encyclopedic content and context, if (and only if) they are glancing mentions and are from "reliable sources of premiere" for "Only English language nations". My reccomendation would therefore be to include such dates only when the event was notable enough to appear in multiple independent reliable sources.
Samuel Tarling (
talk)
13:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Further comment: Although I don't see this heading that way, I advise Whats new? and PhiladelphiaInjstice to make themselves aware of the 3RR if they aren't already. Samuel Tarling ( talk) 13:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
@
PhiladelphiaInjustice: While I'm glad the sourced Australian premiere has finally been allowed in, I hate to break it to you but Latin America, the Middle East, the UK, Germany and Austria are not continents, yet are all mentioned specifically. Kind of undoes your logic a bit, but I think all are valid additions to the article, all have reputable sources and are notable.
User:Whats new?
(talk)
01:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Reading the above, I find the attitude of PhiladelphiaInjustice to be rude and offensive. Personally, I don't care if the article includes the premiere dates or not (although, on first reading about this I was of the opinion that such details might well constitute trivia). Most people won't be interested in them ... but I'm guessing most people aren't interested in reading about 'Fear the Walking Dead' either! But there might well be some people who, being interested in this TV series, are also interested in finding out about its premiere dates (and, if they happen to be, they'll probably look here for such info ... in the belief that an online encyclopedia such as this is able to provide such encyclopedic knowledge).
The matter of the dates is one thing. The issue of how it is dealt with is another one altogether. And for PhiladelphiaInjustice to accuse someone of "having an agenda" and to follow this by describing that users country as "microscopic" and "irrelevant" is absurd (in fact, the use of such words is highly suggestive that PhiladelphiaInjustice has an agenda). PhiladelphiaInjustice suggests that what the other user says is "illogical, disorganized, and impertinent". Indeed, I find PhiladelphiaInjustice descends into poor logic, disorganization and impertinence as he/she seeks to dismiss the points made by Whats new? For Whats new? makes a clear, rational and cordial argument. If PhiladelphiaInjustice can't discuss matters without being abusive or ranting - which, in my view, this user tends towards - then they ought simply to not try and contribute. Simon P Blackburn ( talk) 00:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Ha ha ha! Oh, I do find it funny when people who are losing an argument descend into a rant. Ha ha ha. I really must apologise, given that you thought I was "falsely accusing" you of something. I wasn't. I was offering a view that I thought truthful (and still do). Nice to see you make the leap to claiming (without any evidence) that I am - or have some connection to - the other user. Don't know them, never met them. Of course, I'd be happy to meet them - as it would probably involve a trip "down under" (he lives in Australia, while I'm located in Britain. He's been contributing to this site since 2006, if I read his profile correctly; while I've been doing so since 2008 ... or maybe I'm utterly delusional and he's really me!!!).
As I said above, I started out thinking that adding the dates might well constitute trivia. But I offered by "two cents" on the issue given the illogical, disorganized, and impertinent remarks by PhiladelphiaInjustice - who has gone on to repeat his illogical, disorganized, and impertinent drivel!!! I'm always baffled by those who, upon being informed that their approach might be erroneous, simply "dig in" and spout abuse. You see, I don't actually care whether the dates for countries are cited. Include them or don't. And I'm open-minded enough to say that my view on this matter might be totally wrong. It's not something that bothers me. Nor does being called "highly hypocritical and sanctimonious". Nice one. Even so, Mr. PhiladelphiaInjustice, your attitude to others stinks - and I just don't see how your approach to this matter is in any way a positive contribution. My view is, be tolerant of others and relate to them in a civil, respectful manner - unless they demonstrate intolerance. You did demonstrate intolerance towards "Whats new?" - so I pointed that out. Of course, you'll no doubt wish to offer some delightful retort ... Go on, have the last word! Let's see what you can come up with - as you obviously enjoy spewing forth verbal dung whenever a user says something contrary to your opinion. I'm sure you can do so much better than merely saying "highly hypocritical and sanctimonious". And I'm definitely expecting some form of ironic ineptitude. Have fun. You've certainly provided me with a smile. Simon P Blackburn ( talk) 18:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
I just read a couple of articles about how AMC blocks their videos for viewing in russia and how it encourages illegal downloads. Would this be something to include in the article? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUs45qepsCs
109.225.220.173 ( talk) 20:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Since the series has already been picked up for a second season, I went ahead and created the redirects Fear the Walking Dead (season 1) and Fear the Walking Dead (season 2) in case we want to split content by season. If editors are interested in working on articles about individual episodes, the first season should be pretty easy to create a Good topic since there are only 6 episodes. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I thought I explained in my edit why I had done what I did. I can leave the references, as I didn’t know they were needed after they have been proven to be correct. That’s my fault. But I changed the characters’ info/bio—whatever you want to call it—to resemble The Walking Dead’s wiki page. It added more in depth detail and I thought it described the characters more than what it currently is. Hurricane Seth ( talk) 05:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
I changed it to show an in depth analysis of the characters and to mirror TWD's page. Hurricane Seth ( talk) 06:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi everyone! I tried moving this draft to the namespace but another editor reverted my edits. What do you think? Should it be published? I think it should. The Optimistic One ( talk) 13:01, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Since there is an article already created for Madison, Does anybody think we should create articles for Alicia, Nick, Travis, Chris, Victor, Ofelia, and Daniel? Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Pretty soon we should create drafts for Travis, Chris, Ofelia, Luciana. Matt Campbell ( talk) 15:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 15:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Here are the drafts for drafts for Travis and Chris! Matt Campbell ( talk) 14:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 14:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Pretty soon we should start on some drafts for Ofelia, Luciana, Troy, and Jake! Matt Campbell ( talk) 14:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Remember to follow the notability guidelines when creating a cast list: not every fictional character ever created deserves to be listed and even fewer will deserve an individual article.-- Alex TW 15:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I did sign my posts! Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk)
Here are the drafts for drafts for Draft:Ofelia Salazar (character) and Draft:Luciana Galvez (character)! ~~ User:Matt Campbell~~
TheKerberos01 believes that Victor Strand was a recurring character in season 1 because he appears in two episodes, this is because he believes that appearing in two episodes count as a guest role. Guest means that you only appeared once, recurring starts at two appearances. This link supports my statement by referring to Strand as a recurring character. Please feel free to discuss. The Optimistic One ( talk) 01:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
And with the Nwes, I'm sure that's what they meant, that he'll have more than one gig. And if not, do you seriously believe a New? As has been said before, for example, Colman will have 12 appearances in Season 4, but in fact they were 11. Or we were told that Cohan and Lincoln will have six episodes. But after their departure, there were only five. Well, there is still the second half of Season 9, but Cohan is more likely to occur again. In the end, I would like to say that a lot has already been told in the news, but not everything was right. TheKerberos01 ( talk) 12:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
I seen online that it will be released in the summer of this year would that be June also if that is true when could you make the page for this season B.Maidment ( talk) 23:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Okay..... Where do I start? This show's quality has drastically declined in the last year or so, ever since the new showrunners came along in the beginning of the fourth series. I've already stopped watching it halfway through the current series. The fanbase has noticed this too and ratings and reviews have been on a constant drop. The critics is catching on and comparing it negatively to the first couple of series's. Can we add the shows recent reviews and popularity? All that's in the reception section is the RT score. I would like to see what critics have to say about thelast couple of episodes of the show.
The Optimistic One (
talk)
21:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
how can i help Year2040 ( talk) 10:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Should this article be moved to Fear the Walking Dead? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
For the pilot episode:
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 23:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I am too lazy to look up the referenced term's technical definitions, but why does a Wiki editor insist that the premiere's running time is 63 minutes, even though AMC's own website lists its episode length at 90 minutes?-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 15:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
For episode 2:
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 01:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Please, decide once, does that role have the actress in this series?. A day walk into this article and I see that Patricia is in the principal cast, then come back and see that this section of the recurring cast. This is very confusing.-- Philip J Fry • ( talk) 11:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
While this link does say "They watch Mrs. Cruz’s husband attack her in her front yard", it contradicts the content of the episode itself: 1) Alicia, with flashlight, looks out the front window of her mother's house and sees the next-door neighbour—identifiable by the plaid shirt he's seen wearing earlier in the episode while loading water and supplies into the trunk of his car and coughing—shuffling in zombie fashion towards the street, in the direction of the Cruz's home; 2) the man attacking Mrs Cruz is not wearing the shirt Mr Cruz is earlier seen wearing; and (most telling) 3) Alicia distinctly says to her mother as Mrs Cruz screams "Mom, Mr Dawson's hurting them." Thus, the attacker isn't Mr Cruz. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 16:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
For episode 3:
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 03:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Collapsed discussion unrelated to this television series
|
---|
|
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Tonight (10/11/15) on the Talking Dead, it was announced that season 2 would begin February 14, 2016 (of all days!). Can this be worked in somewhere? FriarTuck1981 ( talk) 03:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Due to the large amount of vandalism and illiterate spam coming from IP addresses, I hope that someone who knows what he is doing will request page protection for FTWD's article (like that on TWD's article.) FTWD looks like it is going to be a ratings monster and thus attract spam from every prankster and his mother, so why postpone the inevitable?-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 23:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Because there doesn't appear to be an influx of defacement of vandalism as you seem to imagine. Just as the policies you cited as an excuse to arbitrarily remove an entire segment of talk page including multiple users responses do not exist. If you are new to Wikipedia I strongly suggest you spend more time observing others, reading over ACTUAL policies that exist, and joining some of the communities around about the place. ( Personal attack removed) 121.211.33.244 ( talk) 10:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Am I losing my marbles or have they really already humped the bunk and skipped a week? S01E03 should have released last Sunday, but there appears to be no sign of it. Given the lackluster banality of this TV show and how boringly slow it's progressing, more like a teenage drama attempting to 'bring zombies to teen girls' as opposed to a lateral take or expansion of TWD universe skipping a release date could quite literally be a killing blow for this series. At present I doubt there will be a season 2, but can anyone confirm whether there's just a bit of constipation in the distribution channels to Australia where I am (and pirate websites, too) or whether they really humped the bunk and didn't release episode 3 on time / at all yet? 121.211.56.55 ( talk) 06:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I have reinstated this post, it was arbitrarily removed by User:PhiladelphiaInjustice who seems to be new to Wikipedia and thinks that because I have an inability to communicate without the normal profanity adults use is in breach of some imagined policy. Thankfully wikipedia is not censored, or as an Australian I would find it incredibly hard to write if it were. The post above is even more relevant now after another episode has turned up MIA, so I will reinstate it. 121.211.33.244 ( talk) 10:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
It appears that my above commentary is even more relevant. Another weekend, another missing episode. Given the pedigree of the series when it was announced I originally said that I bet it will be one of those single-season-only-spinoffs because of Hollywood insurance. There is a reason that there are hundreds of spin offs of good pedigree shows that last one season where they're intentionally distributed poorly to cause failure - you can make more money off of one failed season than several successful seasons. Many underwriters will take the gamble, I mean why would a Walking Dead spin off fail? Walking Dead is huge, so a spin off will be well received, you'd have to get M Knight Shamalamadingdong directing it to mess this up, or him AND Lucas! So undoubtedly it was insured for a pretty penny to run into the umpteenth season. Sadly this isn't even a conspiracy, it's something avidly discussed among many film production students the world over, and is a woefully overused tactic by producers to make big bucks in a fire and forget contractual deal. Two weekends in one month with missing episodes truly appears as though they're intentionally attempting to write this TV series off, and the only reason you write off a TV series of good material is if you have a better insurance policy. 121.211.33.244 ( talk) 10:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
We don't need to know when FTWD premiered in every country in the world. TWD's article only lists the U.S. and international premiere dates, as do other I've checked. Also, tedious Australian ratings details about the premiere barely belong in their newspapers, much less on this international encyclopedia.-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 22:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
And just because other show's article have a "Home media section" does not mean that one belongs here if its only entry is not encyclopedic. Please, Wiki is not a newspaper that lists every trivial detail: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a newspaper.-- PhiladelphiaInjustice ( talk) 22:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Hi
Whats new? and
PhiladelphiaInjustice, while you both present very good arguements as to why the inclusion of when FTWD premiered in particular countries is or is not necessary on the article, my third opinion will ultimately side with
PhiladelphiaInjstice. This is mainly due to the general ideas behind
What Wikipedia is not. However,
Whats new? raises some very good points as to its inclusion on the basis that it does provide addtional encyclopedic content and context, if (and only if) they are glancing mentions and are from "reliable sources of premiere" for "Only English language nations". My reccomendation would therefore be to include such dates only when the event was notable enough to appear in multiple independent reliable sources.
Samuel Tarling (
talk)
13:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Further comment: Although I don't see this heading that way, I advise Whats new? and PhiladelphiaInjstice to make themselves aware of the 3RR if they aren't already. Samuel Tarling ( talk) 13:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
@
PhiladelphiaInjustice: While I'm glad the sourced Australian premiere has finally been allowed in, I hate to break it to you but Latin America, the Middle East, the UK, Germany and Austria are not continents, yet are all mentioned specifically. Kind of undoes your logic a bit, but I think all are valid additions to the article, all have reputable sources and are notable.
User:Whats new?
(talk)
01:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Reading the above, I find the attitude of PhiladelphiaInjustice to be rude and offensive. Personally, I don't care if the article includes the premiere dates or not (although, on first reading about this I was of the opinion that such details might well constitute trivia). Most people won't be interested in them ... but I'm guessing most people aren't interested in reading about 'Fear the Walking Dead' either! But there might well be some people who, being interested in this TV series, are also interested in finding out about its premiere dates (and, if they happen to be, they'll probably look here for such info ... in the belief that an online encyclopedia such as this is able to provide such encyclopedic knowledge).
The matter of the dates is one thing. The issue of how it is dealt with is another one altogether. And for PhiladelphiaInjustice to accuse someone of "having an agenda" and to follow this by describing that users country as "microscopic" and "irrelevant" is absurd (in fact, the use of such words is highly suggestive that PhiladelphiaInjustice has an agenda). PhiladelphiaInjustice suggests that what the other user says is "illogical, disorganized, and impertinent". Indeed, I find PhiladelphiaInjustice descends into poor logic, disorganization and impertinence as he/she seeks to dismiss the points made by Whats new? For Whats new? makes a clear, rational and cordial argument. If PhiladelphiaInjustice can't discuss matters without being abusive or ranting - which, in my view, this user tends towards - then they ought simply to not try and contribute. Simon P Blackburn ( talk) 00:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Ha ha ha! Oh, I do find it funny when people who are losing an argument descend into a rant. Ha ha ha. I really must apologise, given that you thought I was "falsely accusing" you of something. I wasn't. I was offering a view that I thought truthful (and still do). Nice to see you make the leap to claiming (without any evidence) that I am - or have some connection to - the other user. Don't know them, never met them. Of course, I'd be happy to meet them - as it would probably involve a trip "down under" (he lives in Australia, while I'm located in Britain. He's been contributing to this site since 2006, if I read his profile correctly; while I've been doing so since 2008 ... or maybe I'm utterly delusional and he's really me!!!).
As I said above, I started out thinking that adding the dates might well constitute trivia. But I offered by "two cents" on the issue given the illogical, disorganized, and impertinent remarks by PhiladelphiaInjustice - who has gone on to repeat his illogical, disorganized, and impertinent drivel!!! I'm always baffled by those who, upon being informed that their approach might be erroneous, simply "dig in" and spout abuse. You see, I don't actually care whether the dates for countries are cited. Include them or don't. And I'm open-minded enough to say that my view on this matter might be totally wrong. It's not something that bothers me. Nor does being called "highly hypocritical and sanctimonious". Nice one. Even so, Mr. PhiladelphiaInjustice, your attitude to others stinks - and I just don't see how your approach to this matter is in any way a positive contribution. My view is, be tolerant of others and relate to them in a civil, respectful manner - unless they demonstrate intolerance. You did demonstrate intolerance towards "Whats new?" - so I pointed that out. Of course, you'll no doubt wish to offer some delightful retort ... Go on, have the last word! Let's see what you can come up with - as you obviously enjoy spewing forth verbal dung whenever a user says something contrary to your opinion. I'm sure you can do so much better than merely saying "highly hypocritical and sanctimonious". And I'm definitely expecting some form of ironic ineptitude. Have fun. You've certainly provided me with a smile. Simon P Blackburn ( talk) 18:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
I just read a couple of articles about how AMC blocks their videos for viewing in russia and how it encourages illegal downloads. Would this be something to include in the article? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUs45qepsCs
109.225.220.173 ( talk) 20:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Since the series has already been picked up for a second season, I went ahead and created the redirects Fear the Walking Dead (season 1) and Fear the Walking Dead (season 2) in case we want to split content by season. If editors are interested in working on articles about individual episodes, the first season should be pretty easy to create a Good topic since there are only 6 episodes. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I thought I explained in my edit why I had done what I did. I can leave the references, as I didn’t know they were needed after they have been proven to be correct. That’s my fault. But I changed the characters’ info/bio—whatever you want to call it—to resemble The Walking Dead’s wiki page. It added more in depth detail and I thought it described the characters more than what it currently is. Hurricane Seth ( talk) 05:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
I changed it to show an in depth analysis of the characters and to mirror TWD's page. Hurricane Seth ( talk) 06:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi everyone! I tried moving this draft to the namespace but another editor reverted my edits. What do you think? Should it be published? I think it should. The Optimistic One ( talk) 13:01, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Since there is an article already created for Madison, Does anybody think we should create articles for Alicia, Nick, Travis, Chris, Victor, Ofelia, and Daniel? Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Pretty soon we should create drafts for Travis, Chris, Ofelia, Luciana. Matt Campbell ( talk) 15:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 15:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Here are the drafts for drafts for Travis and Chris! Matt Campbell ( talk) 14:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 14:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Pretty soon we should start on some drafts for Ofelia, Luciana, Troy, and Jake! Matt Campbell ( talk) 14:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Remember to follow the notability guidelines when creating a cast list: not every fictional character ever created deserves to be listed and even fewer will deserve an individual article.-- Alex TW 15:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I did sign my posts! Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk)
Here are the drafts for drafts for Draft:Ofelia Salazar (character) and Draft:Luciana Galvez (character)! ~~ User:Matt Campbell~~
TheKerberos01 believes that Victor Strand was a recurring character in season 1 because he appears in two episodes, this is because he believes that appearing in two episodes count as a guest role. Guest means that you only appeared once, recurring starts at two appearances. This link supports my statement by referring to Strand as a recurring character. Please feel free to discuss. The Optimistic One ( talk) 01:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
And with the Nwes, I'm sure that's what they meant, that he'll have more than one gig. And if not, do you seriously believe a New? As has been said before, for example, Colman will have 12 appearances in Season 4, but in fact they were 11. Or we were told that Cohan and Lincoln will have six episodes. But after their departure, there were only five. Well, there is still the second half of Season 9, but Cohan is more likely to occur again. In the end, I would like to say that a lot has already been told in the news, but not everything was right. TheKerberos01 ( talk) 12:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
I seen online that it will be released in the summer of this year would that be June also if that is true when could you make the page for this season B.Maidment ( talk) 23:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Okay..... Where do I start? This show's quality has drastically declined in the last year or so, ever since the new showrunners came along in the beginning of the fourth series. I've already stopped watching it halfway through the current series. The fanbase has noticed this too and ratings and reviews have been on a constant drop. The critics is catching on and comparing it negatively to the first couple of series's. Can we add the shows recent reviews and popularity? All that's in the reception section is the RT score. I would like to see what critics have to say about thelast couple of episodes of the show.
The Optimistic One (
talk)
21:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
how can i help Year2040 ( talk) 10:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)