I replaced the NudeastheNews ref. since it was a dead link, but the other reference you mentioned, from CD Universe, doesn't need to be removed. The information from that reference is published by
Muze, a provider of media information about products such as CDs.
Dan56 (
talk)
20:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Sure, but it's really Muze that is the source (shown at bottom of the page in copyright). CD Universe is just one of the several retail sites that uses their information;
J&R,
Best Buy,
Buy.com, to name a few.
Dan56 (
talk)
20:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)reply
CD Universe and other retailers are fine to use to source release info, but not reviews. Reviews should almost only be sourced by the publication itself.
Adabow (
talk ·
contribs)
03:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The two links I showed you are like CD Universe and besides, the articles you gave as examples became GA/FA in 2007-08. They may not be up to date to today's standards.
GamerPro6417:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
CD Universe seems fine to use, except for reviews as the 2nd opinion says. But how is Acclaimed Music not up to the standards, exactly?
Dan56 (
talk)
18:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The links I gave you aren't the real citations. They are just a mish-mash of accolades from different magazines or websites, just like CD Universe was to reviews.
GamerPro6418:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Not really a mish-mash; the accolades compiled are all related to the album. I replaced the direct references to a publication/accolade, but there are two citations using AcclaimedMusic that support a general statement and not a specific accolade, such as "has been named one of the best songs of all time by numerous publications.[1][49]". Is that all right?
Dan56 (
talk)
19:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
I replaced the NudeastheNews ref. since it was a dead link, but the other reference you mentioned, from CD Universe, doesn't need to be removed. The information from that reference is published by
Muze, a provider of media information about products such as CDs.
Dan56 (
talk)
20:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Sure, but it's really Muze that is the source (shown at bottom of the page in copyright). CD Universe is just one of the several retail sites that uses their information;
J&R,
Best Buy,
Buy.com, to name a few.
Dan56 (
talk)
20:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)reply
CD Universe and other retailers are fine to use to source release info, but not reviews. Reviews should almost only be sourced by the publication itself.
Adabow (
talk ·
contribs)
03:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The two links I showed you are like CD Universe and besides, the articles you gave as examples became GA/FA in 2007-08. They may not be up to date to today's standards.
GamerPro6417:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
CD Universe seems fine to use, except for reviews as the 2nd opinion says. But how is Acclaimed Music not up to the standards, exactly?
Dan56 (
talk)
18:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The links I gave you aren't the real citations. They are just a mish-mash of accolades from different magazines or websites, just like CD Universe was to reviews.
GamerPro6418:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Not really a mish-mash; the accolades compiled are all related to the album. I replaced the direct references to a publication/accolade, but there are two citations using AcclaimedMusic that support a general statement and not a specific accolade, such as "has been named one of the best songs of all time by numerous publications.[1][49]". Is that all right?
Dan56 (
talk)
19:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply